Archived Topic

Honor Code

by BigCougsFan · 4/17/2010

Advertisement
D
Ddawg
Mars wrote:

2- What makes you think dropping out of school and avoiding discipline is the proper step to correct it, as opposed to facing official discipline like a man?



Like I said before, I've seen nothing to back up the popular opinion that Harvey is doing anything mature or proactive here. It could just as easily be the opposite. But I don't know all the facts, and neither do you. [/color]


#1) Come on Mars - the fact that Harvey has "withdrawn" from school - it is not an effort to avoid discipline. It's 1 step in a difficult process. It is stepping up. Ultimately - no matter all the detailed drama - it is Harvey stepping up & making the decision the withdraw & do the right thing. I think it is admirable - regardless of how the "charges" came to light.



#2) " .... opposed to facing official discipline like a man .... " What? Who said Harvey is running away from discipline? I think it's impossible for Harvey to run & hide. This thing is huge!



#3) My feelings are - however this came to light - Harvey & Keilani are facing the music. They are humiliated & embarrassed personally. They have embarrassed their families. Their lives are really impacted - big time. They are going through the process w/ their Church Leaders. I feel Harvey & Keilani are mature, facing the music, doing the right thing - and it is an ordeal for them & their families. I support them & wish them the best. We are human. Humans are fallible. We make mistakes.



#4) I believe it is our job as friends & supporters of Harvey (and Keilani) - to show empathy. I believe that as Christians - we need to be compassionate & love Harvey. This is not the time for recrimination or harshness. They are paying a terrible price. IMHO. I could be wrong. I think not.
M
Mars
Ddawg wrote:
the fact that Harvey has "withdrawn" from school - it is not an effort to avoid discipline. It's 1 step in a difficult process. It is stepping up. Ultimately - no matter all the detailed drama - it is Harvey stepping up & making the decision the withdraw & do the right thing. I think it is admirable - regardless of how the "charges" came to light... My feelings are - however this came to light - Harvey & Keilani are facing the music... They are going through the process w/ their Church Leaders. I feel Harvey & Keilani are mature, facing the music, doing the right thing... I support them & wish them the best.

That's all your opinion. But so far, he hasn't acted any different than Ryan Kessman or Shiloah Teo. Not a single difference. All three got themselves into trouble and then dropped out of school. Reading nobility into Harvey's actions so far, like Schmoe admitted, is wishful thinking only, nothing more. I hope our best hopes for the kid are right, while our worst fears might be the reality.
D
Ddawg
Mars wrote:
the fact that Harvey has "withdrawn" from school - it is not an effort to avoid discipline. It's 1 step in a difficult process. It is stepping up. Ultimately - no matter all the detailed drama - it is Harvey stepping up & making the decision the withdraw & do the right thing. I think it is admirable - regardless of how the "charges" came to light... My feelings are - however this came to light - Harvey & Keilani are facing the music... They are going through the process w/ their Church Leaders. I feel Harvey & Keilani are mature, facing the music, doing the right thing... I support them & wish them the best.

That's all your opinion. But so far, he hasn't acted any different than Ryan Kessman or Shiloah Teo. Not a single difference. All three got themselves into trouble and then dropped out of school. Reading nobility into Harvey's actions so far, like Schmoe admitted, is wishful thinking only, nothing more. I hope our best hopes for the kid are right, while our worst fears might be the reality.


Jeez Mars. I'll have to sit down & buy you lunch sometime - so we talk. I have to get the whole picture of you. I cant' believe that in real life you're so harsh. Your writing is pretty tough. Man my brutha!!



I don't put Harvey in the same category as Teo at all. That's just me. I feel boozing it up vs. yielding to a strong passion that the Lord placed within us - a little different. Both wrong. No excuse for sin - but a whole different program in my mind. I am not privy to any details. I would have be included in the process to really know what's going on. We all know that won't happen. I'm lucky if my accountant allows me to see my tax returns - I'm always out of the loop!! But, sincerely, I have empathy & compassion for Harvey - whereas w/ Teo - none. The 2 incidents are just different to me. Call me crazy - it's just my gut reaction.
I
imuakahuku
Ddawg wrote:
And can someone answer this, does Harry Reid have a temple recommend? :utard:


Good heavens!!!! I just threw up in my mouth!!!! He probably does. However, he needs to be flogged w/ a large wet towel (IMHO).



I did talk to someone last year that was an intern in Washington D.C. They said they would see him @ Church on Sunday. Believe it or not - they said he was pleasant & personable. Uggghhh!!!! I'm sorry - I detest his political positions. He drives me to drinking (Diet Dr. Pepper that is).

8)




LOL!
L
Lawboy
All I know is that BYU does not get involved in this with the HC Department until Harvey discusses this with his ecclesiastical leader. At BYU, that Always comes first. I do not know if Harvey went to his bishop on his own, the girl went to hers first, both together. All I know is that Harvey met with is bishop, and things went from there, as they must at BYU. And without any detail on that, no way to say how Harvey acted without speculating. I won't.



And to say that he must see where the HC Department would act and then face those consequences first is lame. He may have already met with them, known what was to happen, and given the optional to withdraw first. And if he did, so what. He is a freaking human being, not a cyborg. We all make mistakes, and we all deserve the grace of God when we do it. Our process is our own, and no one else's.



Only reason anyone cares is because we thought Harvey could carry the rock and help BYU win more football games. I think Bronco got it right--Harvey and his needs come first, football second in this case. I hope Harvey pulls it together and uses this as a positive in his life, whether he plays for BYU ever again or not.
Advertisement
W
Wickchad
I have registered as a minister with the First Evangelic Revisionist Sunrise Ministry Church of the Internet. I am more than happy to offer an ecclesiastical endorsement for Harvey.
I
Italics
I found this post on MWCboard... great post IMO



"This only reinforces my position - I'm a non-grad BYU fan who is against the honor code.



What I'm opposed to is this sort of circus, and I really feel for the kids. It's not about keeping athletes in school, it's about letting young students have the private space to find their own way in life.



None of us have our own laundry aired like this - I'm sure most of us have plenty in our present or past that could be derided, jeered or ridiculed.



IMO - a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned. I'd prefer that the honor code were structured more in that direction, less legal in nature, more fuzzy and personal.



This thread is replete with low-minded sneering and smearing - based in mob mentality at its worst. It's precisely that sort of garbage that I'd like to help these kids avoid.



Maybe BYU isn't the best fit for all - and hopefully students could have open conversations with Deans and Coaches - like these students actually did - and find their own path. In the absence of the honor code - that could be just another transfer, stay private, and not be sensationalized in some peurile voyeuristic fashion.



That is a pretty preachy/presumptuous position...but these are pretty big changes in two young peoples' lives, and I'd like to see them have the best shot for love and happiness that they can have, and I worry that it will be more difficult for them than it needs to be, because of the media circus, and because of the mean-spiritedness evident in this thread."




I especially enjoyed this phrase: "a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned."

Several pompous students will make the claim that having a "code" somehow saves the moral lives of these kids. I agree with the poster's point that true morality is self-enforced based upon ones principals. The HC is not preparation for the real world at all, and any student who actually IS living a moral life just because of the honor code, is most likely certainly not going to remain that way when there is no "code" being enforced.

I grew up my entire life on the east coast where there were very few members. The youth who truly had morals were the ones who stayed active and worthy. The ones who didn't were the ones who would sin the moment they weren't under the watch of church members and leadership. I think sometimes it's too difficult a concept for Utah/Idaho mormons to imagine following the commandments without some sort of code or committee constantly watching over them. This amounts to great followers, and awful leaders - and a LOT of people who rarely faced true opposition bragging about their chivalry.
I
Italics
Schmoe wrote:
Is it the same? What about wearing shorts?


I said it twice, but maybe that wasn't enough for you to pick it up.

I said if one DOES want to argue differences, it's that Rexburg is MORE strict.

Some of you really do have your responses programmed and pre-determined, and you'll utter them no matter what evidence or ideas have been brought up. Is that what they teach in the schools at Utah?
I
Italics
snoscythe wrote:







Yeah, people who play fast and loose with the truth always have the upper hand. You were trying to sound more in the loop than you really are, and you got called on it. Just apologize and move on.


Not really. I think most people on this forum are familiar with me and know that I attend BYU-I - a fact which I have pointed out on my own accord several times. Do you see me telling Schmoe he has no place in any of this because he attended Utah State?

Rather, you were the one trying to mislead by making it seem like I'm referring to the honor code at Iowa State. Same honor code, same re-admission process. But I'm not going to call you forth to repentance.

It's always the same with members like you: as soon as someone states opinions that are not your own - ridicule, ridicule, ridicule. And then when they use logic - up the ante on the ridicule. It's a big part of the reason why the church is ridiculed the way it is, and why some idiots assume we're all a bunch of mindless tools who cannot think for themselves. Sometimes threads like this make me feel the same way, but then I always realize that for the most part, I am only dealing with one particular breed of mormonism.
I
Italics
Ddawg wrote:



#2) " .... opposed to facing official discipline like a man .... " What? Who said Harvey is running away from discipline? I think it's impossible for Harvey to run & hide. This thing is huge!



#3) My feelings are - however this came to light - Harvey & Keilani are facing the music. They are humiliated & embarrassed personally. They have embarrassed their families. Their lives are really impacted - big time. They are going through the process w/ their Church Leaders. I feel Harvey & Keilani are mature, facing the music, doing the right thing - and it is an ordeal for them & their families. I support them & wish them the best. We are human. Humans are fallible. We make mistakes.




And do you believe any of this is a good thing for Harvey?



Is this the way repentance ought to happen?



I know in point 4 you talked about how everyone should support him, etc. etc. But that's just not what happens. Things become "huge," as you said - the kids become humiliated and embarrassed, as well as their families. When things like this happen, kids like Harvey might as well have their own reality TV show. It's like Provo and surrounding areas use this as their own sick form of entertainment - and they always try to transform it into some sort of righteous indignation.

Anyone who doesn't see the tragedy in the way situations like these unfold needs to re-learn the gospel.
Advertisement
R
rblack
I wish Unga well, whether he finds a way to play his last year at BYU or whether he seeks to move on to the NFL.

That said, I wish everyone would quit speculating on what happened. We don't know. I don't care. Whether it's a morality issue, a word of wisdom issue or any other issue, to my knowledge he hasn't said and we really don't need to know. From everything I have read and heard, Unga is a class act and he appears to be trying to keep this classy as well. Whether he comes back to BYU or not, I will always consider him as one of the greatest players to wear a Cougar uniform. I know this, if all of my past faults were common knowledge, I would not want to show my face at church. Fortunately we have Bishops and Stake Presidents to help us through those past faults and we only have to worry about our current faults. Right now there is mass speculation about Unga's faults. What there needs to be is support for him and the other athlete. Speculation=Rumors. Rumors are always harmful and never helpful or innocent.
L
Lawboy
I think the one thing that should be noted here is that Harvey has yet to speak on this, and BYU has only issued it's usual statement that either 1) an ecclesiastical endorsement was withdrawn, or 2) and HC violation occurred which resulted in consequence. BYU NEVER comments on what happened. Ever. Harvey could if he wants to, but has chosen to remain silent. The aspect that becomes sport is the speculation that goes on. Not saying Harvey should speak, it is his choice. But he could release a statement. i would advise him to, and to let people know his future plans, at a minimum.
S
Sammich
Italics wrote:
I found this post on MWCboard... great post IMO



"This only reinforces my position - I'm a non-grad BYU fan who is against the honor code.



What I'm opposed to is this sort of circus, and I really feel for the kids. It's not about keeping athletes in school, it's about letting young students have the private space to find their own way in life.



None of us have our own laundry aired like this - I'm sure most of us have plenty in our present or past that could be derided, jeered or ridiculed.



IMO - a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned. I'd prefer that the honor code were structured more in that direction, less legal in nature, more fuzzy and personal.



This thread is replete with low-minded sneering and smearing - based in mob mentality at its worst. It's precisely that sort of garbage that I'd like to help these kids avoid.



Maybe BYU isn't the best fit for all - and hopefully students could have open conversations with Deans and Coaches - like these students actually did - and find their own path. In the absence of the honor code - that could be just another transfer, stay private, and not be sensationalized in some peurile voyeuristic fashion.



That is a pretty preachy/presumptuous position...but these are pretty big changes in two young peoples' lives, and I'd like to see them have the best shot for love and happiness that they can have, and I worry that it will be more difficult for them than it needs to be, because of the media circus, and because of the mean-spiritedness evident in this thread."




I especially enjoyed this phrase: "a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned."

Several pompous students will make the claim that having a "code" somehow saves the moral lives of these kids. I agree with the poster's point that true morality is self-enforced based upon ones principals. The HC is not preparation for the real world at all, and any student who actually IS living a moral life just because of the honor code, is most likely certainly not going to remain that way when there is no "code" being enforced.

I grew up my entire life on the east coast where there were very few members. The youth who truly had morals were the ones who stayed active and worthy. The ones who didn't were the ones who would sin the moment they weren't under the watch of church members and leadership. I think sometimes it's too difficult a concept for Utah/Idaho mormons to imagine following the commandments without some sort of code or committee constantly watching over them. This amounts to great followers, and awful leaders - and a LOT of people who rarely faced true opposition bragging about their chivalry.

I agree with the spirit of what you're saying, but I totally disagree with the premise that BYU needs to get rid of the "enforcement" side of the honor code. I'm sure there are differing opinions on why the honor code exists, but the most important one in my book is a simple one. Make the kids who want the drinking/drugs/sex/partying/nightlife college experience look for a different school. And for that reason alone, making the honor code an "internal, personal" thing would be a disaster, because the type of kid I mentioned wouldn't take that honor code seriously.
U
urroner
Italics wrote:
And do you believe any of this is a good thing for Harvey?



Is this the way repentance ought to happen?



I know in point 4 you talked about how everyone should support him, etc. etc. But that's just not what happens. Things become "huge," as you said - the kids become humiliated and embarrassed, as well as their families. When things like this happen, kids like Harvey might as well have their own reality TV show. It's like Provo and surrounding areas use this as their own sick form of entertainment - and they always try to transform it into some sort of righteous indignation.

Anyone who doesn't see the tragedy in the way situations like these unfold needs to re-learn the gospel.


If anything good comes of it is up to Harvey and his girlfriend. They probably enjoyed the fame they had on campus and with the BYU fans, but with fame comes the crap of if you do something wrong, it will get noticed.



How many of the people who are told to leave BYU because of breaking the HC do we hear about? Very few and why is that? It's because they are just Joe or Jane Average. Very few people, compared to how many know about Harvey, know J Average, but that isn't true about Harvey and it's just not people in the Provo area who talk about stuff like this Italics. I live in Florida and some people asked me about Harvey. If anybody of any position of notice at BYU or in the Church are discovered doing anything that isn't deemed to be proper, it will get noticed and talked about. I took a lot of crap for the former BYU student for tasering that woman and I don't even know the dude.



Harvey signed his John Doe on the Honor Code and it is expected for him to abide by it or face the consequences.



Yes, it's sad that his action are announced from the rooftops of Provo, but that is just human nature, not just Provo or Utah nature.



But one thing I do know, people all over the place, especially in Provo/Orem, tend to be very forgiving.
D
Ddawg
Italics wrote:



#2) " .... opposed to facing official discipline like a man .... " What? Who said Harvey is running away from discipline? I think it's impossible for Harvey to run & hide. This thing is huge!



#3) My feelings are - however this came to light - Harvey & Keilani are facing the music. They are humiliated & embarrassed personally. They have embarrassed their families. Their lives are really impacted - big time. They are going through the process w/ their Church Leaders. I feel Harvey & Keilani are mature, facing the music, doing the right thing - and it is an ordeal for them & their families. I support them & wish them the best. We are human. Humans are fallible. We make mistakes.




And do you believe any of this is a good thing for Harvey?



Is this the way repentance ought to happen?



I know in point 4 you talked about how everyone should support him, etc. etc. But that's just not what happens. Things become "huge," as you said - the kids become humiliated and embarrassed, as well as their families. When things like this happen, kids like Harvey might as well have their own reality TV show. It's like Provo and surrounding areas use this as their own sick form of entertainment - and they always try to transform it into some sort of righteous indignation.

Anyone who doesn't see the tragedy in the way situations like these unfold needs to re-learn the gospel.




#1) Do I believe any of this is good for Harvey? Some. The private conversations, the internal self reflection, the personal choice to change & improve. That has value & is what is important.



Withdrawing from school, off the team, the public circus, all the drama - IMHO, little to NO value. I vigorously disagree w/ the public humiliation "thing."



#2) Is this the way repentance ought to happen? Do you mean the whole public circus thing? No!! It should be personal, private, confidences kept, sincere, loving & supportive by Church authorities & family. Unfortunately - many times - it is not.



#3) The reason I mention in point #4 - "supporting Harvey & Keilani" - is - I have a close friend that was Ex'd. I saw him sincerely put ought a solid effort to "do the right thing." He went through the whole process. He came to Church - week after week. He was treated so poorly. Snubbed. Ignored. He quit coming to Church & now has very bitter feelings. I DO NOT want that to happen to Harvey & Keilani. This has the real potential to happen exactly as my friends experience did. I hope it does not.



I really disagree w/ what is happening here to these 2 kids. I hope their friends, family & Church leaders are wrapping their arms around them & loving them. I could not be more sincere. There's a real potential for personal tragedy to have a disastrous lasting impact here. I hope it is avoided.
Advertisement
G
Gunk
Sammich wrote:
I found this post on MWCboard... great post IMO



"This only reinforces my position - I'm a non-grad BYU fan who is against the honor code.



What I'm opposed to is this sort of circus, and I really feel for the kids. It's not about keeping athletes in school, it's about letting young students have the private space to find their own way in life.



None of us have our own laundry aired like this - I'm sure most of us have plenty in our present or past that could be derided, jeered or ridiculed.



IMO - a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned. I'd prefer that the honor code were structured more in that direction, less legal in nature, more fuzzy and personal.



This thread is replete with low-minded sneering and smearing - based in mob mentality at its worst. It's precisely that sort of garbage that I'd like to help these kids avoid.



Maybe BYU isn't the best fit for all - and hopefully students could have open conversations with Deans and Coaches - like these students actually did - and find their own path. In the absence of the honor code - that could be just another transfer, stay private, and not be sensationalized in some peurile voyeuristic fashion.



That is a pretty preachy/presumptuous position...but these are pretty big changes in two young peoples' lives, and I'd like to see them have the best shot for love and happiness that they can have, and I worry that it will be more difficult for them than it needs to be, because of the media circus, and because of the mean-spiritedness evident in this thread."




I especially enjoyed this phrase: "a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned."

Several pompous students will make the claim that having a "code" somehow saves the moral lives of these kids. I agree with the poster's point that true morality is self-enforced based upon ones principals. The HC is not preparation for the real world at all, and any student who actually IS living a moral life just because of the honor code, is most likely certainly not going to remain that way when there is no "code" being enforced.

I grew up my entire life on the east coast where there were very few members. The youth who truly had morals were the ones who stayed active and worthy. The ones who didn't were the ones who would sin the moment they weren't under the watch of church members and leadership. I think sometimes it's too difficult a concept for Utah/Idaho mormons to imagine following the commandments without some sort of code or committee constantly watching over them. This amounts to great followers, and awful leaders - and a LOT of people who rarely faced true opposition bragging about their chivalry.

I agree with the spirit of what you're saying, but I totally disagree with the premise that BYU needs to get rid of the "enforcement" side of the honor code. I'm sure there are differing opinions on why the honor code exists, but the most important one in my book is a simple one. Make the kids who want the drinking/drugs/sex/partying/nightlife college experience look for a different school. And for that reason alone, making the honor code an "internal, personal" thing would be a disaster, because the type of kid I mentioned wouldn't take that honor code seriously.


Reminds a bit of when I was in the Provo MTC. MTC "security" would ride around the MTC and neighboring blocks in vans watching for misbehaving missionaries. Didn't think much of it, but one day the mother of my companion dropped some stuff off for her son on the grass across the street (my companion grew up 3 blocks from the MTC). She didn't talk to us or anything. Just dropped it off and was getting back in her car when MTC "security" caught her. "Security" then proceeded to yell at my companion's mom, tell her she was breaking the rules, etc to the point my companion's mother burst into tears.



After that, I had to really wonder what the purpose of MTC "security" was. Every missionary in the MTC is an adult. If a missionary wants to break the rules or run away from the MTC, that's his prerogative. He/She is even the one paying to be there.



But for some reason the MTC and to a slightly lesser degree BYU seem to have this idea of "enforcing" the rules. To the point where they hire "security" to drive around in vans making sure everyone is behaving.



I don't see the point in it really, especially when dealing with adults. The men/women that want to misbehave will misbehave. Those that want to do good, will do good. I only see the need for enforcing it if inappropriate/immoral behavior is impeding or affecting those choosing otherwise.



Drinking and immoral behavior, like skate boarding :P , should not be tolerated on the BYU campus. Students not wanting to or making an effort to live the honor code should be shown the door; however, "security" vans, hall monitors and tattle-tale roommates are not needed.
C
Cougy_Monster
I think sometimes it's too difficult a concept for Utah/Idaho mormons to imagine following the commandments without some sort of code or committee constantly watching over them.


Anybody who labels people as Utah/Idaho mormons is a bigot with no credibility. It's such a stale argument made by small people who are embarrassed to be called mormons so they tell their friends they are different than those other mormons.



And all this complaining about consequences is tiresome. Never, ever in the history of organized true religion have mistakes / transgressions / sins gone unpunished. And never has the Church been so organized as it is today to allow for such swift repentance and reinstatement of full blessings. Anyone who has availed himself of his priesthood leader's guidance and gone through the repentance process knows this. Some aspects of Church participation are often withheld temporarily during the repentance process and the Church has chosen to view enrollment in BYU as one of those aspects.



Missing classes or not playing football mean absolutely nothing compared to what can be learned by an honest acceptance of consequences. How Harvey responds to this situation will shape who he becomes.



After Corianton had issues (dare we say honor code violations?) on his mission his dad lectured him for a while and in essence told him to quit worrying about the punishment not being fair and just worry about fixing what he did wrong. It's good advice (alma 42:29).
D
Ddawg
Gunk wrote:
Italics wrote:
I found this post on MWCboard... great post IMO



"This only reinforces my position - I'm a non-grad BYU fan who is against the honor code.



What I'm opposed to is this sort of circus, and I really feel for the kids. It's not about keeping athletes in school, it's about letting young students have the private space to find their own way in life.



None of us have our own laundry aired like this - I'm sure most of us have plenty in our present or past that could be derided, jeered or ridiculed.



IMO - a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned. I'd prefer that the honor code were structured more in that direction, less legal in nature, more fuzzy and personal.



This thread is replete with low-minded sneering and smearing - based in mob mentality at its worst. It's precisely that sort of garbage that I'd like to help these kids avoid.



Maybe BYU isn't the best fit for all - and hopefully students could have open conversations with Deans and Coaches - like these students actually did - and find their own path. In the absence of the honor code - that could be just another transfer, stay private, and not be sensationalized in some peurile voyeuristic fashion.



That is a pretty preachy/presumptuous position...but these are pretty big changes in two young peoples' lives, and I'd like to see them have the best shot for love and happiness that they can have, and I worry that it will be more difficult for them than it needs to be, because of the media circus, and because of the mean-spiritedness evident in this thread."




I especially enjoyed this phrase: "a moral code only really holds when its self enforced based upon principals or goals that are internalized and owned."

Several pompous students will make the claim that having a "code" somehow saves the moral lives of these kids. I agree with the poster's point that true morality is self-enforced based upon ones principals. The HC is not preparation for the real world at all, and any student who actually IS living a moral life just because of the honor code, is most likely certainly not going to remain that way when there is no "code" being enforced.

I grew up my entire life on the east coast where there were very few members. The youth who truly had morals were the ones who stayed active and worthy. The ones who didn't were the ones who would sin the moment they weren't under the watch of church members and leadership. I think sometimes it's too difficult a concept for Utah/Idaho mormons to imagine following the commandments without some sort of code or committee constantly watching over them. This amounts to great followers, and awful leaders - and a LOT of people who rarely faced true opposition bragging about their chivalry.

I agree with the spirit of what you're saying, but I totally disagree with the premise that BYU needs to get rid of the "enforcement" side of the honor code. I'm sure there are differing opinions on why the honor code exists, but the most important one in my book is a simple one. Make the kids who want the drinking/drugs/sex/partying/nightlife college experience look for a different school. And for that reason alone, making the honor code an "internal, personal" thing would be a disaster, because the type of kid I mentioned wouldn't take that honor code seriously.


Reminds a bit of when I was in the Provo MTC. MTC "security" would ride around the MTC and neighboring blocks in vans watching for misbehaving missionaries. Didn't think much of it, but one day the mother of my companion dropped some stuff off for her son on the grass across the street (my companion grew up 3 blocks from the MTC). She didn't talk to us or anything. Just dropped it off and was getting back in her car when MTC "security" caught her. "Security" then proceeded to yell at my companion's mom, tell her she was breaking the rules, etc to the point my companion's mother burst into tears.



After that, I had to really wonder what the purpose of MTC "security" was. Every missionary in the MTC is an adult. If a missionary wants to break the rules or run away from the MTC, that's his prerogative. He/She is even the one paying to be there.



But for some reason the MTC and to a slightly lesser degree BYU seem to have this idea of "enforcing" the rules. To the point where they hire "security" to drive around in vans making sure everyone is behaving.



I don't see the point in it really, especially when dealing with adults. The men/women that want to misbehave will misbehave. Those that want to do good, will do good. I only see the need for enforcing it if inappropriate/immoral behavior is impeding or affecting those choosing otherwise.



Drinking and immoral behavior, like skate boarding :P , should not be tolerated on the BYU campus. Students not wanting to or making an effort to live the honor code should be shown the door; however, "security" vans, hall monitors and tattle-tale roommates are not needed.


Hey Gunk - Wasn't there a guy a few years back that taught: "Moderation in all things." Who was that???? Now - I am not advocating we tolerate grievous sin. But - the whole "Security van" story is very illustrative. A good point. Thx.



These "Rule Nazi's" can get over zealous. Another story. A dear family friend was married in the L.A. Temple. She had a beautiful Temple wedding dress custom made. It was white - but just a tad "off white."



When in the Temple, fully dressed, ready to go - the Temple worker told her she could not wear her dress - it was not white enough. My friend looked around the room & saw other girls w/ the exact shade of white wedding dresses. She asked - "What about those other girls & their dresses?" The worker said" "Oh, those are old dresses from their Mother's & Grandmother's, they've aged & look that "off white" color. But yours, it's not old - it's new - so you can't use it. Unless - did you borrow it from your Mother?"



Now, she had a moral dilemma. Does she lie & say - "yes, it was my Mother's dress" and be allowed to use it. Or, be honest, and have to take the dress off. She was honest, took the dress off. Rented the clothing she needed - and got married in tears. Her day was nearly ruined. Over zealous rule Nazi's???

I think so. It's really an unnecessary & unfortunate situation.
S
snoscythe
Whenever the devil harasses you, seek the company of men or drink more, or joke and talk nonsense, or do some other merry thing. Sometimes we must drink more, sport, recreate ourselves, and even sin a little to spite the devil, so that we leave him no place for troubling our consciences with trifles. We are conquered if we try too conscientiously not to sin at all. So when the devil says to you: do not drink, answer him: I will drink, and right freely, just because you tell me not to.
U
urroner
Ddawg wrote:
Now, she had a moral dilemma. Does she lie & say - "yes, it was my Mother's dress" and be allowed to use it. Or, be honest, and have to take the dress off. She was honest, took the dress off. Rented the clothing she needed - and got married in tears. Her day was nearly ruined. Over zealous rule Nazi's???

I think so. It's really an unnecessary & unfortunate situation.


I would have asked to see the temple president.
Page 3 of 6
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.