Schmoe wrote:
I know that labeling BYU as the Lord's University is silly and that the Brethren don't have a lot of input as far as academics are concerned. I do, however, find it hard to believe that they would not be involved in the honor code rules and how they are enforced.
If there weren't consequences for doing bad things, would we keep doing them? Do those consequences help us? No, the rules help us avoid the unwanted consequences. So asking if these consequences will "help" Harvey is downright stupid, following the honor code would have helped him.
These are both extremely simple minded arguments.
"If there weren't consequences for doing bad things, would we keep doing them?"
Believe it or not, there are still punishments for sin WITHOUT the honor code. Currently, the "consequences" for breaking the "code" often times lead to students facing unnecessary ridicule, embarrassment, and humiliation. Often times, these kids are outcast and put into situations where they will have less support and be in an easier situation to sin. Their education is a whole other topic. But hey, that's "they way it is," and it's "what's in the contract," so I guess that excuses it, right? Why question it when we can just mindlessly conform?
You're only fooling yourself if you seriously think the HC is preventing some gigantic multitude of sin on BYU's campus. Kids who want to drink will drink. Kids who want to have sex will have sex. Heck, a good number of things in the honor code are not even scriptural or based off of actual commandments, so most of the "code" isn't even preventing sin in the first place.
But hey, not being given a chance to exercise self-discipline and agency for good is overrated. It's soooo much more efficient to be watched over and told what to do your entire life. It's a much better plan than testing people to see if they fear God more than man. Just ask Satan, he'll tell you all about how great a plan it is.