If this is true I am disgusted, not only at Franchuck, but at BYU for a reactionary move. If they suspended while he was working on things with his bishop, without a recommendation from the bishop to do so; then this is one of the worst things I have heard of, and I will lose a lot of respect for the TH and anyone that had a decision in this.
You never, ever, EVER kick a man while he is down trying to get up. If Davies was working on things, and his bishop felt he was making enough progress (and his gf isn't pregnant) then this is one of the saddest things I have ever heard of. Not only from a rankings standpoint, but from a personal standpoint.
If this is true, then Franchuck becomes the scum of the earth, and the BYU AD gets seriously diminished in my eyes. Would it have been so hard for the BYU AD to say
"We haven't previously heard of these allegations. What Davies is or isn't doing is between him, his ecclesiastical leader (bishop), and the Lord - until such point that his leader feels it appropriate to recommend suspensions or some other action from the institution."
"We will verify things on our side of the story, and whatever the circumstances would be, we hope the best for the student and it is our goal to help him achieve it, through whatever means necessary to achieve those purposes."
Would something like that really have been hard? It would have been very proper in my eyes. If someone is going to shoot someone you know, you don't go get a gun and shoot them first (before the others' get around to it)!
IF this is true, I will have lost a lot of respect for BYU and the intrusion of privacy between the bishop and a member. And how did Franchuck know? What is his "source?"
(I have been on the receiving end of my bishops overstepping their bounds, and a repentance process made public when I was about 15, and it almost made me leave the church. The whole thing was an overreaction between two bishops that talked to each other about people's confessions, and I got dragged into the middle, and because of it, I couldn't trust that bishop ever again. I had him for almost 4 years after that, and though the matter he was overstepping his bounds was trivial, I got into some semi-serious stuff later on, and had noone to turn to until we changed Bishops again. A girl and I were kissing (just smooches), and she thought we were committing sexual sins so she talks to her bishop, whose daughter is married to my bishops son. He passes it on, and my bishop calls me in and tells me that I am basically having sex with girls, that I need to break up with that girl, and start seriously repenting. He wouldn't believe that I wasn't doing anything more than just kissing like teenage kids do. That girl was my first real kiss, and I was hers, hence the overreaction by her. So I was basically labeled as a sex-fiend by my bishop at a young age. It was pretty out of control)
and I'm not saying the bishop overstepped his bounds in this case. But if this is true it's clear that someone did, and that is unacceptable. Hopefully we can figure out who it was, and they will have to go through the same kinds of things Brandon has had to go through (if any/all of this is true)