S
SpiffCougI think SI just gave us a big reason.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/magazine/02/28/ucla/index.html?eref=sihp&sct=hp_t11_a1 " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
by SpiffCoug · 2/29/2012
declocoug wrote:
WHEW! I thought for a second that the title of this thread meant that Carlino was leaving BYU.
Thanks UCLA, keep up the good work down there.
CougarClaw wrote:
Carlino: I'm looking for a program
Rose: you can come here
Carlino: Will you call me names, hit me, spit in my face or make me play with concussions?
Rose: um no. but you will have to live the H...
Carlino: I"M IN.
frdbtr wrote:
...I am surprised that UCLA hasn't fired this coach yet.
EM_Puma wrote:...I am surprised that UCLA hasn't fired this coach yet.
It will be interesting to see if there is any fallout from such a scathing article. How are the player benefits mentioned not a violation of NCAA rules? I keep wondering why the NCAA was so concerned about OSU players and tats and not such issues of drug abuse and player benefits that were mentioned in this article. No one mentioned $$$, but come on, in that environment and that many top recruits there was no money flying around while players are being escorted in Rolls limo?
As focused on detail as Howland was, his players had the freedom to enjoy the perks of being a Bruin during UCLA's run to the three consecutive Final Fours. There were nights out with current and former NBA players, television stars and models. One evening the partying started at the Beverly Hills mansion of a wealthy UCLA fan. The Bruins were then chauffeured in a Rolls-Royce to a West Hollywood club, where several players were ushered past a long line of people and given VIP treatment at a table in the back. Says one player, "We'd go back to the campus bars and students would say, 'Where have you been?' We'd be like, 'If you only knew.' "
Read more:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/magazine/02/28/ucla/index.html#ixzz1no1LSSs4 " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Yea, and during this trip to this West Hollywood club, the players all paid for their own drinks, food and entertainment. Sure.
SpiffCoug wrote:
Yeah, OSU got off very light. I find it hard to believe the OSU players were only getting tattoos for their wares at that particular parlor.
imuakahuku wrote:Yeah, OSU got off very light. I find it hard to believe the OSU players were only getting tattoos for their wares at that particular parlor.
There was no charges nor indications (unlike TCU) that players were caught or indicted for selling, distributing, or using drugs. The tatoos were the tip but the body was moslty the players selling game jersey's, awards they had won, and other NCAA items that they had "earned" from football. IIIRC there were some acusations about money from a few boosters and some cars to use or that they were able to purchase w/o credit checks or jobs and such. I will also say that I think that they didn't actually go to far below the surface, that there probably was even more to it but I think the quick actions of OSU to fess up, coach resigning, self imposed sanctions and the like made the NCAA stop looking and then come up additional sanctions for the violations. Kind of like they did with Auburn and USC. They dug a little under the surface and were probably afraid of what they would find so they just acted on the dirt they had and ended it there. USC and Auburn at the very least would probably be getting the death penalties if the NCAA were serious about rules enforcement. But they are trying to protect their cash cow and making "token" gestures that get enough press is about all we will probably ever see.