Archived Topic

A little bummed...

by Dcr36 · 9/24/2011

Advertisement
D
Dcr36
...about this board.



I was at the game tonight, and frankly it was probably the most fun I've had at a home game in a couple years, since Utah '09. Watching the offense stall drive after drive was frustrating, but I got to see my first BYU kickoff return EVER (against a fast team, to boot), the D came up HUGE when we needed it, the stadium was loud, we were on the ESPN mothership for all the country to see, and we pulled out a win over what I assume is a very good football team.



I was thinking that, after a week of 1-4 (and at least one 1-5) predictions, the disposition here might be a little more sunny now that we have at least have some semblance of momentum going into the USU game. And yet, it's really just a lot more grumbling about Heaps, and to a lesser extent our secondary. I understand the purpose of a discussion board is to discuss issues, generally ones that attract a variety of opinions, but the negativity surrounding our program here is kind of overwhelming.



Heaps isn't a world-beater. I'm not even sure you could call him average at this point. I'm increasingly open to the possibility that he may end up more of a "steward" than a "king" in the BYU QB tradition. But I think we have to criticize him and the rest of our offense under the light that thus far, our offense has played against 4 defenses that I would classify between "above average" to "very good." (Perhaps I'm giving Ole Miss too much credit, but still.) Of our remaining games, the only defenses that put any fear into my heart are TCU (who nonetheless look a little down), and maybe USU (they draw up some interesting plays). Hawaii doesn't really concern me, I think we match up okay.



I think playing against cupcakes is going to be good for the "soul" of our offense. Granted, I thought the same thing last year, but maybe they still need 4 or 5 games where they can regroup, reconfigure and figure some things out against lesser talent. Heaps has had two of the more grueling opening schedules in recent BYU memory, and it's possible that the two openings combined have gotten into his head. He's got a few games up ahead that hopefully will help him exorcise some demons.



That's my two cents. I think we've got a reason to cheer up. I think between the WAC, Oregon State, and ISU, we should be able to win most of our games from here on out. And a 9 or 10 win season (which seems very possible to me, at the moment) may be a bummer to some of you, but I'll take it.
B
BoiseBYU
Hear! Hear!! What an exciting game. The team found a way to win. They showed me heart and grit. I'll take it.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
S
superchargedcougar
I was so excited when Hoffman ran that kick back that when I jumped up my very expensive prescription sunglasses went flying and I didn't even care! Then I remembered that I'm a poor college student so I quickly looked around for them. While both the offense and the defense drove me nuts at times, I had a great time hangin with my friends and watching my team win. I just wish that the Utah game had gone like this one.
C
CougarClaw
I'm a little bummed about the offense. yup. Still, even after a win.



I predicted BYU would score 17 and that's exactly what they did. I just wasn't counting on Hoffman taking it to the house.



Jacobsen was targetted about 10x this game and should have had MAJOR yards. but a look at the box score shows 1 catch for 4 yards.



All in all, I'm getting tired of the word "potential" now that we're back at .500. While I'm glad for the win, if we had one more bad break like the utah game, we lose this one too.
G
Gunk
Doman in the box was a smart move. Play calling was much better this game.
Advertisement
C
cougdoc
Dcr36 wrote:
I was thinking that, after a week of 1-4 (and at least one 1-5) predictions, the disposition here might be a little more sunny now that we have at least have some semblance of momentum going into the USU game. And yet, it's really just a lot more grumbling about Heaps, and to a lesser extent our secondary. I understand the purpose of a discussion board is to discuss issues, generally ones that attract a variety of opinions, but the negativity surrounding our program here is kind of overwhelming..


Years ago, on his post-game call-in show, Lavell said that the best time to forcefully correct a player was after a successful play or series or game. That way, he said, the player wasn't dwelling on his failure and was more receptive to the correction. I refrained from making a single negative post after last week's debacle, but now after our limited success tonight I will join the chorus: less Heaps, more Nelson, less Graham Rowley, more KVN blitzing, fewer five yard outroutes, more TE drags at 15 yards.
K
KYCoug
Sorry for the 8) blue glasses but I still say we finish the season 10-3. :utard: will leave a bad taste for a long time and our offense will still sputter but with the exception of TCU we should win every game.



Go Cougs!



L Hatton

Louisville, KY
I
imuakahuku
KYCoug wrote:
Sorry for the 8) blue glasses but I still say we finish the season 10-3. :utard: will leave a bad taste for a long time and our offense will still sputter but with the exception of TCU we should win every game.



Go Cougs!



L Hatton

Louisville, KY


I agree that 10-3 is the most likely record at the end of the year but I think 11-2 is highly likely too. We have USU and Idaho before TCU and I think those two games along with the one last night (which I think gave our O line a huge boost of confidence),will prepare our offense for TCU so I think that one is 50-50. I feel like the team that makes the least mistakes (penalies and turnovers) wins. Our team is doing just enough to win and if we only have two TO's last week that game goes down to the wire and we verly likely would have won it. But the D gave up after being put into the pressure cooker so many times. Last night the D stepped it up closer to the level that they should be at and our O-line finaly got mean and nasty. They gave Jake a lot of time and with a few more games under his belt he stops with the panic throws and makes good reads. Also, last night is a blowout if he and Jacobson ever get on the same page. I think those two need to stay after practice to get their timing down and reads on the same page.



I also like what the D-line did to force pressure with three man rushes. I would like to see someone (e.g. CJ Ah You or Hoke) work with Ansah this summer. He is a beast and looks the part but needs to learn more technique.



Game balls to Van Noy, Kaveinga, Fangupo, Kariya, and special teams that played exceptionally well except for the brain fart of getting the 15 yard penalty. They should be aware that a muff cannot be advanced it just happened against Utah. Sure, take it into the EndZone but understand that if its ruled a muff then it goes back out. Thank goodness our O-line and especially Kariya rose to the challenge. What ever happened to the idea "act like youv'e been there"?



C- or D to the DB's. Too many blown assignments and not enough "big" plays to make up for them. UCF almost pulled this one off because of DB's lack of position mastery. They keep jumping to "help" and then get burned bad. How many times will it take for a WR or RB getting down field behind the D for them to understand that they can't just let guys run by them without sticking to them. All I can say is thank goodness the UCF WR is dog slow. I guess he proves you don't have to have any speed at WR to play D-1 ball.
I
IowaCougar
KYCoug wrote:
Sorry for the 8) blue glasses but I still say we finish the season 10-3. :utard: will leave a bad taste for a long time and our offense will still sputter but with the exception of TCU we should win every game.



Go Cougs!



L Hatton

Louisville, KY

Never apologize for blue goggles!



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.