Although the vote is trending to Detmer, I will
emphatically voice my support for him.
I can understand that some might want to vote for McMahon, but when you really examin it Detmer wins every time.
Many of you probably already read this Top 10 list, but for the "Detmer Doubters" you must read it to see how Detmer is clearly the #1 BYU QB of all time
http://www.bluecougarfootball.com/2011/06/top-10-ty-detmer-moments-10-essence-of.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Additionally,
1. Detmer's OOC schedule was heads and shoulders more difficult than McMahon's.
McMahon had the like of Long Beach St, North Texas, and Wisconsin and Colorado when they were both bad football programs.
Detmer played 4 top 5 teams.
Even with the tougher competition, Detmer posted a higher pass efficiency rating, by a long ways, over his career. Which leads into reason number 2 ...
2. Detmer's records lasted a lot longer than McMahon's.
We can argue all day about why Detmer's numbers were better, but McMahon was the better QB. For me, the fact that Detmer's NCAA records lasted longer than McMahons did is a fair measuring stick. While McMahon raised the bar for quarterback play, those who came after him quickly matched and excceeded that mark. His career passing yards was beat just two years later.
Detmer's numbers were so great, it took well over a decade before players started to come close.
3. McMahon has the "Miracle Bowl" comeback, but Detmer has the Oregon (1989), the Washington State (1990) and San Diego State (1991) comebacks to his credit. Yes, the Miracle Bowl is the most impressive, but Detmer could lead huge comebacks and refused to quit and lose just as much.
4. Watch the old games.
Detmer makes countless jaw dropping plays.
Detmer isn't remembered as much of a runner, but he was mobile and could scramble and pick up yardage in bundles. Plus, he would find a way to get out of sacks like you have never seen before. His pocket presence was unbeleaveable.