hawkwing wrote:
So what exactly is it about Jimmer that makes him an atypical PG for the NBA. Is it his height, his agility, his shooting percentage, his assist-to-turnover ratio, his defense? Please elaborate.
Well, I guess the guys bagging on him would say, if they were pinned down and put on truth serum to answer the same question, His inferior skin color, his inferior (non-BCS) university, and the "over-rated-ness" by some---which ultimately in my mind comes down to those who believe in The Jimmer and those who dont. Sounds pretty atypical to me. Which makes him if anything an "atypical" lottery pick more than an atypical PG.
As for me, I believe. But if I were to compare, i'd put my money on Irving. NOt sure sure i'd put my money on Jimmer being a Star in the NBA. Just a matter of probability. I give him a 1 in 3 chance of being a star--which are pretty high odds. Further, I would say he has a higher chance of succeeding than flaming out, for whatever that is worth.
Jimmer did best when he got to take over the game. Will someone really turn over the reigns of their team to the Jimmer. So again, it comes down to whether or not someone believes and gives him the reigns after a few years of experience.
Blah, blah, blah. Sorry, thats all I got. May not pass the test. Good question Hawk. I think its central to The Jimmer Equation who gambles and who doesnt come thursday night.