byucougar1 wrote:
From strictly a recruiting standpoint, we now offer more than the Yewt group and others with the TV and fan-base exposure that we can garner in the future.
WIN.
To me, that is the biggest impact of this issue. Look at the home schedule Utah has vs. our home schedule, and tell me which you would rather have. It's simple=-Utah's. But starting in 2013, our home schedule gets really tasty, along with some awesome road games, like we have in 2011. I always knew BYU could schedule games, as the ND and Texas deals shows, but they were both 2 for 1, and that meant uneven scheduling, and off games some years, which typically means poor teams.
BYU can not build a home schedule on the back of the WAC and expect to compete long term in this marketplace with Utah bringing in PAC-12 opponents. The fence sitter fan or CFB fan would rather go see a game at RES than LES based on 2011 opponents if it is the trend. So BYU has to get quality games at LES. The ESPN deal allows it now because ESPN will splash some cash for a team to come to Provo to play. That part is huge with this deal. BYU has to get quality games at home. Has to. When they show up on schedule, along with our solid road schedule, our recruiting will not suffer one bit due to the PAC affiliation for Utah because our players will play top teams in interesting venues, and on the largest college football platform possible. 2014 and beyond now looks brighter.