hawkwing wrote:
Lawboy wrote:
Ohio State: Best team a pawn shop can sell. OR a tattoo artist can put grafitti on.
I'd rather add MIchigan, Wisconsin or Penn State, to be honest. Even Michigan State or Iowa. The Buckeyes need to stick to the Little Sisters of the Poor routine.
I'd be thrilled to play Ohio State. However, it would likely come in a one and done situation or 2 for 1 that favors Ohio State. I'm fine with that. I have a feeling the new reality of BYU scheduling would look like this:
1 FCS team every year.
Hawaii, Utah, and Utah State every year
1 home game and 2 road games against 2 for 1 opponents every year (ND, Texas, Ohio State, Michigan, Penn St., Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, etc.)
1 game vs. other BCS conference opponent
4 games against WAC, MAC, MWC, CUSA teams.
If you're right in the long term, I'll be the first one calling for Holmoe's job.
There are only a handful of teams I'm willing to play 2 for 1s with, and if we fall into that role I won't support the AD.
Wow, really? I think that type of schedule is a major upgrade with what we are used to.
I'm fine with BYU playing only one home game for every two road games against the following teams: Michigan, Notre Dame, Ohio St., Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, USC, Nebraska, Tennessee, Penn St., Florida St., Georgia, LSU, Miami, Auburn, Florida.
If all of those teams went winless for a decade while during that same decade BYU won at least 10 games a year and finished nationally ranked, BYU still wouldn't surpass any of those teams in all time wins or all time top 25 finishes. They would only have more bowl appearances than 4 of them. In addition, all of those programs outdraw BYU by more than 10,000 per game except Miami and they have all won National Titles (most of them more than one).
Considering those teams' collective history, tradition, and economic reality are far superior to BYU's, it wouldn't be a slight to BYU at all to schedule 2 for 1s with these programs.