Lawboy wrote:
Even in the NBA, the top guys shoot maybe 12-13 FT/GAME average. Expecting more than that is silliness and means you are looking for calls. Basketball is a physical game and contact should be allowed or else a foul could be called on about every possession. Basically, I think BYU fans think Jimmer needs to be given even more preferential treatment than he already is and I do not buy it. Stick BYU in the Big East and he probably shoots fewer FTs. The MWC is not a physical league compared to Big East, Big Ten, so I think Jimmer gets what he deserves for the most part. He gets a lot of calls.
Normally I respect what you have to say, but this is just silly. Listen to the arguments you are using: other players' averages? fouls shouldn't be called on every possession? equity in foul calling? Jimmer getting all the calls he
deserves?
If a player drives to the basket and is hacked by the defense, they should be called for the foul. EVEN IF IT HAPPENS EVERY SINGLE POSSESSION. Jimmer is good at driving in and drawing a foul, possibly even more than other "top players," so he's going to shoot more FT than other people. Now you can argue whether Jimmer is actually getting mauled every time they foul him in a technical sense, and that the refs are calling a looser game overall. Maybe you're right, although I disagree. But it is downright stupid to suggest that there should be some kind of "redistribution of wealth" in foul-calling so that it's even for everybody, regardless as to how much they are fouled.
This isn't about blaming losses or performances on the refs, I agree that is a waste of breath. What's happening is Jimmer IS getting mauled, often, when he drives inside. At some point if this keeps up he is going to get injured, which is exactly what foul calls are meant to prevent. Screw the averages and make the calls that need to be made to get the other team to back off, or you're going to end up liable for a season or possibly career-ending injury.