Archived Topic

Big Ten sad new logo and divisions

by Schmoe · 12/15/2010

Advertisement
S
Schmoe
So, the Big Ten has a new macho aqua marine logo:



http://cosbysweaters.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/NewBigTenLogo.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">





And the new divisions aren't East and West, they're not North and South. No, no....the divisions are named "Leaders" and "Legends." :lol:
B
BerliNY
Maybe they've hired the same image consultants that the Big East has been using.
B
BroncoBot
Sounds like they've been consulting with the geniuses at .mtn marketing.
M
Mingjai
Everyone from Minnesota to Illinois (and I'm sure out to Pennsylvania) is making fun of the logo and division names.



Here's a T-shirt mocking the names:



WARNING - THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS SOPHOMORIC COLLEGE HUMOR

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/leaderlegend-t-shirt
B
BigCougsFan
LMAO!



This can't be true. Leaders and Legends? Have they said which school is in which division yet, or just announce the logo and names?



For some reason... I can see all the fans embracing this sort of thing. Some are proud they're a Leader and other proud of being a Legend.



I'm sure they have themselves a pat on the back when they finished this garbage.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
Advertisement
S
scott715
How about calling them Someday and Has Been divisions?
T
tmoney35
Schmoe wrote:
http://cosbysweaters.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/NewBigTenLogo.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">


You'd think with all their money, the Big10 would've hired someone a little more professional than the local high school computer class to design their logo
L
Lawboy
I thought that Dumb and Dumber divisions woked. Or Slow and slower. Perhaps Old and Older.



regardless, whoever did the market research on the color schemes and names failed miserably. Because both combos are horrendously bad.
B
BigCougsFan
Lawboy wrote:
regardless, whoever did the market research on the color schemes and names failed miserably. Because both combos are horrendously bad.


I don't think the market research failed. I think the idiots who approved of this failed.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
Advertisement
T
tmoney35
imuakahuku wrote:
I laugh because it is having an effect on recruiting. Here we go again with political correctness! They even put multiple names on their awards so that every school had representation.

http://www.sportspickle.com/news/4436/michigan-loses-top-recruit-whos-more-interested-in-being-a-leader-than-a-legend


wow...is this for real or am I missing out on the TIC? This just seems ridiculous.



Can you imagine how pissed off michigan must be right now? Also, I can't believe a player would actually change their commitment over something so trivial. Cracks me up how Ron Zook praised the kid's "great character" because we went back on his commitment over the name of the division. what a joke.
M
Mingjai
tmoney35 wrote:
Also, I can't believe a player would actually change their commitment over something so trivial.


Hard to tell with kids these days. Oregon is supposedly better able to recruit because the kids like their uniforms:



http://www.nikeblog.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Nike-Oregon-Ducks-National-Championship-Uniforms.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
B
BoiseBYU
There's one tiny problem: there are TWELVE schools in the conference



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
C
CougarPeasant
Schmoe wrote:
So, the Big Ten has a new macho aqua marine logo:



http://cosbysweaters.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/NewBigTenLogo.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">





And the new divisions aren't East and West, they're not North and South. No, no....the divisions are named "Leaders" and "Legends." :lol:


That's so ghey.
Advertisement
B
Brayden Green
BigCougsFan wrote:
regardless, whoever did the market research on the color schemes and names failed miserably. Because both combos are horrendously bad.


I don't think the market research failed. I think the idiots who approved of this failed.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">




Well they did get a "crocodile" in spelling at their non-conformist yuppie grade school.
B
BroncoBot
BlueIsBetter wrote:
Lawboy wrote:
regardless, whoever did the market research on the color schemes and names failed miserably. Because both combos are horrendously bad.


I don't think the market research failed. I think the idiots who approved of this failed.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">




Well they did get a "crocodile" in spelling at their non-conformist yuppie grade school.

That's a great reference. HA!
Y
Yndian
tmoney35 wrote:
I laugh because it is having an effect on recruiting. Here we go again with political correctness! They even put multiple names on their awards so that every school had representation.

http://www.sportspickle.com/news/4436/michigan-loses-top-recruit-whos-more-interested-in-being-a-leader-than-a-legend


wow...is this for real or am I missing out on the TIC? This just seems ridiculous.



Can you imagine how pissed off michigan must be right now? Also, I can't believe a player would actually change their commitment over something so trivial. Cracks me up how Ron Zook praised the kid's "great character" because we went back on his commitment over the name of the division. what a joke.


Sportspickle is a sports version of The Onion, so no, it's not real.
I
imuakahuku
Yndian wrote:
imuakahuku wrote:
I laugh because it is having an effect on recruiting. Here we go again with political correctness! They even put multiple names on their awards so that every school had representation.

http://www.sportspickle.com/news/4436/michigan-loses-top-recruit-whos-more-interested-in-being-a-leader-than-a-legend


wow...is this for real or am I missing out on the TIC? This just seems ridiculous.



Can you imagine how pissed off michigan must be right now? Also, I can't believe a player would actually change their commitment over something so trivial. Cracks me up how Ron Zook praised the kid's "great character" because we went back on his commitment over the name of the division. what a joke.


Sportspickle is a sports version of The Onion, so no, it's not real.


Of course it is true! opps sorry (TIC) :) Yeah don't believe the "Pickle" they are just a group that likes to "calls it hows I sees it". Personally, I think they are a bunch of college kids mocking everything but sometimes posting some funny things.
C
Cougarfan87
I guess the intent behind all of this was to make the Big 10 tougher due to how much they are getting laughed at. Seriously, someone needs to hire me as an image consultant to keep these guys from hurting themselves. FACEPALM! Here's a few helpful hints to get out of this mess:



1. Say it was all a big gag--the whole being called the Big 10 with 12 teams, and being called Leaders and Legends Divisions. It was just a joke. Boy did we have you guys going.



2. Change the name from Big 10 to something else. Here's a small hint--follow conferences like the ACC, SEC, Big East, CUSA, MWC, and WAC that don't put how many teams are in the conference in the conference name--it makes it easier when teams leave or join. Also, if your conference is good enough, people will automatically know how many teams are in the conference. I know its a leap of faith, but give it a try. Perhaps the NAC--Northern Athletic Conference. Or maybe the MMWAC--Mostly Midwest Athletic Conference. You know, something geographic without the number of teams. Or you could do something like Conference USA and call yourself the Great American Athletic Conference. I think GAAC has a nice ring to it, and then you receive no cricticism if you add a team that doesn't fit your geographic name--such as TCU to the Big East.



3. Leave Big out of it. You know what makes you Big? Winning games. Calling yourself Big doesn't make you Big. Winning BCS title games makes you Big. You haven't done too well there. Drop the Big.



4. Division names should always follow a geographic theme--North v. South, East v. West, etc., unless there is a more salient characteristic that separates the schools. For example, you could have an academic vs. athletic division. Northwestern, Ohio State, and Michigan would be in the academic division, and Iowa, Michigan State, Iowa State, Nebraska and Penn State would be in the athletic conference. Scratch that. Just go with the geographic theme--always.
Page 1 of 2
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.