THIS is my only gripe...

Just saw this in the tweets section. Why didn't we run this play?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UIdI8khMkw&feature=player_embedded" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



PS, I'm kidding. Seriously though, this is hilarious.

I hate the "wrong ball" play, it sucks.

It's cheap and doesn't teach how to play the game the right way. There are "trick" plays where you get the defense over-pursuing and then quickly change the ball's direction (i.e. HB to QB pass). Those kinds of plays can still be properly defended by good defense.



This kind of play is can't and shouldn't be allowed. I hope that TD was called back.

It's not unlike the Max Hall walk-to-the-sidelines play from last year. This play would have been penalized in the college game I bet.

That QB was lucky that all the LBs quit playing. What if someone had lit him up as he walked through the line?

How is this not an unsportsmanlike "attempt to deceive" penalty?

CAFB_04-12 wrote:
That QB was lucky that all the LBs quit playing. What if someone had lit him up as he walked through the line?

Pretty sure that's what would happen at any FBS or NFL game.

kitic77 wrote:
It's cheap and doesn't teach how to play the game the right way. There are "trick" plays where you get the defense over-pursuing and then quickly change the ball's direction (i.e. HB to QB pass). Those kinds of plays can still be properly defended by good defense.



This kind of play is can't and shouldn't be allowed. I hope that TD was called back.

I read a story that said that it was the game tying score. The other team was up 6-0 this happened, and they missed the extra point and the game ended as a tie....

CAFB_04-12 wrote:
It's not unlike the Max Hall walk-to-the-sidelines play from last year.

The play where Max walks a couple steps over to call an audible hurts the defense if they don't watch the ball. They still know that they are playing football as soon as the ball is snapped. This play is a cheap trick on children who are out there to learn the sport and have fun. Lame.

Mingjai wrote:
How is this not an unsportsmanlike "attempt to deceive" penalty?

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags." 15 yards, loss of down.



These are the kinds of coaches that need to be weeded out, especially at the younger levels of the game.

snoscythe wrote:

How is this not an unsportsmanlike "attempt to deceive" penalty?

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags." 15 yards, loss of down.



These are the kinds of coaches that need to be weeded out, especially at the younger levels of the game.

agreed

snoscythe wrote:

How is this not an unsportsmanlike "attempt to deceive" penalty?

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags." 15 yards, loss of down.



These are the kinds of coaches that need to be weeded out, especially at the younger levels of the game.

The Utes and SDSU are currently in a bidding war for his services.

hawkwing wrote:

Mingjai wrote:
How is this not an unsportsmanlike "attempt to deceive" penalty?

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags." 15 yards, loss of down.



These are the kinds of coaches that need to be weeded out, especially at the younger levels of the game.

The Utes and SDSU are currently in a bidding war for his services.

But, can he onside kick when up by 40+?

snoscythe wrote:
I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

Mars wrote:

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

I do...but you don't, and are being an ass, but I still love you :lol: ;)

ABYUFAN wrote:

snoscythe wrote:
I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

I do...but you don't, and are being anass, but I still love you :lol: ;)

I find that term offensive.

Schmoe wrote:

Mars wrote:

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

I do...but you don't, and are being anass, but I still love you :lol: ;)

I find that term offensive.

Is that Anae's brother? Man, you guys are ruthless.

Schmoe wrote:

Mars wrote:

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

I do...but you don't, and are being anass, but I still love you :lol: ;)

I find that term offensive.

I know...most people do. This was all part of an earlier thread. In that earlier thread I said that I found the word douche to be more offesnive than (among other things) ass. (I also included bastard, but I don't think that you can good-naturedly call someone that, so I called him an ass) and by calling him that in refrence to that earlier thread, I acknowledge that I was being one myself. ;)

Mars wrote:

I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

Yes, we should refer to them as children. Kids are goats.

ProV1 wrote:

snoscythe wrote:
I the proper call would be "Personal Foul--Turning 14 year-old kids into douchebags."

Does anyone else find this term offensive?



;)

Yes, we should refer to them as children. Kids are goats.

That's a good one...my wife feels the same way!