S
snoscytheLet me start out by acknowledging that I have been among the foremost in contributing to our recent lovers' quarrel on here. I started with good intentions but ended up paving a less than desirable road. I apologize.
I wanted to share a story from my mission that has some relevance. On my mission we did not have the Book of Mormon in the native language. It had been in translation for years, but the translation committee was deadlocked over how to translate 'priesthood.' The stalemate drew on so long that eventually the matter was taken to President Hinckley. He chose between the words and sent his decision to the mission president. Before the mission president told the committee of the decision, he asked them for a sustaining vote for the prophet. A number of people on both sides of the debate refused to so vote for fear that their word would not be selected. Because they had taken up a cause so passionately for so long, it grew to be more important to them than reason or testimony. They would have preferred to be without the Book of Mormon and go against the prophet than to have the 'other word' used. It cost a branch president and a relief society president their positions.
I think that's what we've seen from both sides of the quarterback debate. It's no longer about what's right, it's devolved into who's right.
Recognizing that fact, I'm done contributing to the divide, and again I apologize.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
I wanted to share a story from my mission that has some relevance. On my mission we did not have the Book of Mormon in the native language. It had been in translation for years, but the translation committee was deadlocked over how to translate 'priesthood.' The stalemate drew on so long that eventually the matter was taken to President Hinckley. He chose between the words and sent his decision to the mission president. Before the mission president told the committee of the decision, he asked them for a sustaining vote for the prophet. A number of people on both sides of the debate refused to so vote for fear that their word would not be selected. Because they had taken up a cause so passionately for so long, it grew to be more important to them than reason or testimony. They would have preferred to be without the Book of Mormon and go against the prophet than to have the 'other word' used. It cost a branch president and a relief society president their positions.
I think that's what we've seen from both sides of the quarterback debate. It's no longer about what's right, it's devolved into who's right.
Recognizing that fact, I'm done contributing to the divide, and again I apologize.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

