Archived Topic

OC as TE just a rumor

by byutx · 9/15/2010

Advertisement
B
byutx
Would be an interesting shake up. But let's be careful about what he choose to believe. This is just a silly rumor that we shouldn't make a big deal of. ;) Some of the other guys currently getting snaps will be playing exclusively on the scout team. Your thoughts?













[Edited after the fact so I won't look like a moron if my sources were wrong and because of other reasons I can't go into.]
B
BoiseBYU
Details? Where did you hear this? Who is on the scout team? BTW I think Chambers would do well as a TE. He is an excellent blocker and should pose matchup problems for LBs no?



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
B
byutx
Rumored on CB and nothing anywhere else. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...
Y
YBrit
BoiseBYU wrote:
Details? Where did you hear this? Who is on the scout team? BTW I think Chambers would do well as a TE. He is an excellent blocker and should pose matchup problems for LBs no?



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">




Watch the Air Force game, he allows a Cadet to get right by him and tackle Nelson on a 3rd down. It would've been an easy first down had Riley went for it sooner, but especially had Chambers blocked the guy. He literally put his hand on the guy's shoulder and let him fly by him...he quit on the play and gave up in the game.



I was there.
B
byutx
YBrit wrote:
Details? Where did you hear this? Who is on the scout team? BTW I think Chambers would do well as a TE. He is an excellent blocker and should pose matchup problems for LBs no?



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">




Watch the Air Force game, he allows a Cadet to get right by him and tackle Nelson on a 3rd down. It would've been an easy first down had Riley went for it sooner, but especially had Chambers blocked the guy. He literally put his hand on the guy's shoulder and let him fly by him...he quit on the play and gave up in the game.



I was there.

He may not have had his heart or head straight, but make no mistake, he's by far the best blocker we've got as a WR and is athletic and strong. Probably a better blocker than Pitta, from what I understand.
Advertisement
B
Brayden Green
byutx wrote:
BoiseBYU wrote:
Details? Where did you hear this? Who is on the scout team? BTW I think Chambers would do well as a TE. He is an excellent blocker and should pose matchup problems for LBs no?



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">




Watch the Air Force game, he allows a Cadet to get right by him and tackle Nelson on a 3rd down. It would've been an easy first down had Riley went for it sooner, but especially had Chambers blocked the guy. He literally put his hand on the guy's shoulder and let him fly by him...he quit on the play and gave up in the game.



I was there.

He may not have had his heart or head straight, but make no mistake, he's by far the best blocker we've got as a WR and is athletic and strong. Probably a better blocker than Pitta, from what I understand.


Chambers is a fabulous blocker. I am not a Chambers lover by any means, not a hater either, just a chambers neutral. But kid can BLOCK! I remember a Riley run that went for a huge game last week, and the only reason it did is because he threw his guy into the front row. He does fabulous on KR's every time he doesn't have the ball, just laying down wood. Chambers can and should do a lot of things better, in mind, but block isn't one of them.
M
Mars


1- I like the idea of Chambers playing Slot.

2- I like the idea of moving Jacobsen back outside.

3- I really, really like the idea of Chambers being coached to drop to the ground imediately after every catch, ala Sr. year Pitta, instead of fighting past the first tackler and then spinning wildly into two more, with the ball only loosely secured...
I
imuakahuku
Don't know if you caught it last night but RWilson twice tweeted. The first just said "changes". The second stated changes a great song. And his first tweet was deleted. Obvious something the coaches are waiting to announce. Then you get Wrubbel saying Talo had some info on a "big change" that he would report on TBS supposedly last night.



BTW - Wrubbel's tweet is gone too. Interesting.



A tweet by wilson that says only one word "changes" Now the tweet is deleted.

A tweet by Wrubbel that said Talo was going to announce on TBS a "big change" that is also deleted.

A tweet by Wilson making reference to a song by tupaq titled Changes. (To me an obvious cover for his first tweet). Makes me think of Pee Wee Herman "I meant to do that".
C
craigoscarson
Just a way out there random guess, but is it possible that Riley plays some tailback and that the Cougs end up with 2 throwing options on some plays?



Or Eason to corner and Bradley to safety like we've discussed before....



Those are changes that seem to make sense.
B
byutx
craigoscarson wrote:
Just a way out there random guess, but is it possible that Riley plays some tailback and that the Cougs end up with 2 throwing options on some plays?

Not unless it's Lark or Munns (or Chambers) making the second pass.
Advertisement
G
Guest
The coaches would be fools to not put in Nelson as a RB on some plays.
Y
Y12
This makes no sense.



He is already a junior. This year is already out of the picture. We will redshirt him next year so he can put on weight and learn the position for one year? By then one of our other tight ends will be the next in a long line of great BYU tight ends.



It worked for Coats because we did it when he was a freshman. Too late for Chambers.
S
Short_Change
craigoscarson wrote:
Just a way out there random guess, but is it possible that Riley plays some tailback and that the Cougs end up with 2 throwing options on some plays?



Or Eason to corner and Bradley to safety like we've discussed before....



Those are changes that seem to make sense.




I agree with both those changes and I hope they happen, but I doubt they will. I think putting Riley at WR on some plays would be cool too. Obivously putting Riley at RB or WR every play or most plays wouldn't be smart but to do it occasionally would be a good idea, IMO. I've though from the beginning that Heaps is the better QB now, but Riley has too much talent to not utilize him. We're over-utilizing Riley and obviously under-utlizing Heaps. Why not take advantage of the talent we have. Between Heaps and Riley there's an enormous amount of talent. Riley has got to be one of the toughest guys we've had in a while and Heaps has more potential than any QB we've ever had, IMO. I don't see why we can't have a Leak/Tebow type tandem.



I think our Defense would be much better with Bradley at safety. I hope they try it.
W
Wickchad
Short_Change wrote:



I think our Defense would be much better with Bradley at safety. I hope they try it.


Do we really want the worst tackler on the team to be the last line of defense between the line of scrimmage and the end zone? The switch they need to make with Bradley is to the bench. Move Chambers to safety. He'd light people up!
B
byutx
Wickchad84087 wrote:



I think our Defense would be much better with Bradley at safety. I hope they try it.


Do we really want the worst tackler on the team to be the last line of defense between the line of scrimmage and the end zone? The switch they need to make with Bradley is to the bench. Move Chambers to safety. He'd light people up!

Bradley is a better tackler than Thomas.
Advertisement
S
Short_Change
Wickchad84087 wrote:



I think our Defense would be much better with Bradley at safety. I hope they try it.


Do we really want the worst tackler on the team to be the last line of defense between the line of scrimmage and the end zone? The switch they need to make with Bradley is to the bench. Move Chambers to safety. He'd light people up!


He's a better tackler than Thomas and would be much better in pass coverage too. He would have Rich right there to help out with tackling instead of kind of being on an island at CB. Tackling may not be a strength of his but he could definitely improve our D if he moved there. He's not the only guy that would help us at FS. Thomas is only 5'11" and 172 lbs. Other guys that could play at FS. Bradley is 6'0" and 193 lbs. Eason is 5'8" and 172 lbs. Uale 6'2 and 197 lbs. Galea'i is 6'0" and 179 lbs. Does anyone know why Galea'i is a SS and not a FS? I think we should move him to FS especially with Sampson coming next year.
J
jonnylingo
Bradley to safety is a no brainer in my mind. Eason has outperformed bradley from what i have seen anyway at corner. i feel comfotable with eason at corner but i do not feel comfortable with thomas at safety. i am sure he is a great guy but he is in over his head there.
B
BoiseBYU
LOL. At first I thought you were saying that Anae was donning the pads again!
B
BYULV
No way Bradley goes to safety as he doesn't have what it takes between the ears. The safeties have to be the brains and leadership of the defense more importantly than being great athletes ... Look at gooch and johnson, big on brains, but only good, not great athletes. I have heard, and it makes sense that Wilson is switching to defense to help with safety duties. Unfortunately it will likely take him a lot of time to catch on and will not likely make an immediate impact. I agree That uale would do well at safety.



I have also caught wind of the chambers to play tight end rumors. Makes some sense for receiving, but don't see how he handles TE blocking assignments. The QB changes with Riley to RB or defense are likely just someones wishful thinking and don't seem to make much sense.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
B
Brayden Green
hawkwing wrote:
The coaches would be fools to not put in Nelson as a RB on some plays.


Kind of seems like he already is.



20 carries > 7 for JJ Di Luigi
Page 1 of 2
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.