I'm a self-admitting BSU fan (sorry), albeit a mild one, but truth be told this article doesn't really convince me of anything.
I do think BSU's SOS is...lacking. To say the least. Yes, one game deciding your season is a terrible system.
What bothers me about the article is it doesn't consider BSU's actual output in recent big games. If a team repeatedly wins BCS bowl games, especially over a short period of time, I don't think it's unfair to give them a shot at the NC.
What frustrates me about the SOS snobs is that, at the current moment, it seems to disregard everybody except the SEC should play for the championship. I mean, come on: there are years where the Pac-10 hasn't thrown a decent challenger at USC, and there have been lopsided years for the Big 10/Big 12 as well. I'm not trying to suggest that the disparity for the teams who skated through their conference schedule in AQ conferences is in any way equivalent to what BSU gets away with, but PLENTY of good teams get away with schedules with only 3-5 bumps along the way. (BSU has 1 1/2 this year, which is pretty bad.)
If we apply this guy's logic across the board - no Big East team should have a shot at the title either, because nobody's going to convince me that the Big East schedule provides more than 2 or 3 real challenges a year. If Oklahoma runs the board this year, do they go to the NC, even though they play a grand total of TWO ranked opponents this year, only one in-conference? (Granted, those are pre-season rankings; I'm sure someone will step up in the Big 12).
I want BSU to do well this year (again, sorry), but you could probably get me to admit that BSU's SOS isn't good enough to get them there. You're never going to convince me, however, that a team needs to be tested week in and week out the way this guy argues, simply because it's not true for most teams.