Archived Topic

Best option for BYU and MWC?

by superchargedcougar · 8/20/2010

Advertisement
S
superchargedcougar
Ok, so everybody has been talking about all the crazy new stuff going on. Personally I think it is awesome that BYU has started a new chapter of the realignment because I felt that there was some unfinished business. Anyway I think that this could end up being really beneficial for BYU and everyone in the MWC including some other teams (Houston, USU, and Hawaii.) first this should be the lineup of teams in the whatever you want to call the new conference (Mountain WAC?) and how the conference could look.



North

BYU

Boise State

Air Force

Utah State

Hawaii

New Mexico



South

TCU

Houston

UNLV

Nevada

San Diego State

Fresno State



OR



West

BYU

Boise State

Hawaii

UNLV

Nevada

Utah State



East

TCU

Houston

Air Force

Fresno State

SDSU

New Mexico



As you can see, the MWC and the WAC would combine and take the best teams and add Houston. the leftovers could join C-USA or Sun Belt or something like that.





Also, the Champ of the MWC would play the champ of C-USA (pretty much a joke game since the number 5 MWC team should be able to beat the C-USA champ) and the conference of the Winner of the game would get all the money from that game. This would make more money even if it doesn't help the chances of getting a BCS bid.



Finally, the MWC-WAC hybrid would get a new TV deal (with ESPN - I mean look at what they did for Boise State) with BYU having the ability to rebroadcast all games.



Winners: Houston, USU, Hawaii, MWC, C-USA, ESPN

Losers: leftovers from WAC and MWC, The MTN channel



Tell me what you think
S
superchargedcougar
If Utah doesn't go to the Pac-whatever (which I don't know why they would do that) then they would replace either Houston or Utah State. Any feelings on Utah leaving and WHY they would stay?
S
superchargedcougar
UTEP could replace Houston, Hawaii, or Utah State in this scenario if Utah does go (which i still don't know why they wouldn't)
S
sandiegoblue
I like the name "Mountain WAC" even if it's not very likely. It would clearly be a challenge to decide how to line up the teams if your scenario plays out. But as long as BYU gets broadcasting rights, I am ok with them staying in the MWC and having more teams in the league. I would be surprised if Utah gets rejected from the PAC, but I would still take them back and look forward to the annual rivalry - even though the vicious interactions between the fans is obnoxious.



I think it comes down to MWC playing smart instead of with their pride to work out a TV deal with BYU. If not, we will just be looking for the right landing spot for our sports ex-football as we go Independent.



I have great confidence BYU will work out something that makes them better off than before this rumor mill began.



Good to have you on here!
S
superchargedcougar
pride is always the downfall of great people and groups... hopefully the leaders in charge don't use it instead of their brains
Advertisement
S
SpiffCoug
What about calling it the WEAC (pronounced weak). Western Elite Athletic Conference?
R
redneckjedi
How about the MWAC, and the logo would be a duck. The league would probably run like one, too. ;)
S
superchargedcougar
I don't care what they're called as long as they get what they deserve
A
Airwolf
The MWC, WAC, C-USA... good grief... why not include the Mid-American, Sun-belt and Big Sky and conferences, take all the teams which typically have losing seasons (about 2/3 of them) and call it the SDSC (Suck Dog State Conference)? :lol:



Here is the combined records for each conference from last season:



MWC: 61-52

# of teams with winning record: 5/9



WAC: 59-58

# of teams with winning record: 4/9



C-USA: 70-82

# of teams with winning record: 4/9



Total W-L record for the 3 conferences: 190-192. :blush:
S
superchargedcougar
That's exactly why the MWC needs to grab Houston and dump Wyoming and CSU. So they have more wins and less losses on record
Advertisement
S
Schmoe
We can't dump any teams.
M
mizzoucoug
Wolfie is here! Sweet! It's like a poltergeist that keeps on going and going.
S
SpiffCoug
Part of the reason we are where we are today is that BYU has been considering what's also good for the conference. BYU is finally trying to just figure out what is the best option for BYU. If that option is also good for the MWC then that's just a byproduct of the decision and not a determining factor.
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.