B
bpleweWhile I like the upside of independence, here's another risk that just occurred to me, given the anti-BYU vitriol in MWC-WAC-land that seems to be increasing daily:
Let's say BYU goes indy, but spurns the WAC-2, going to say the WCC for non-football. In this case, we have successfully shafted both the MWC and WAC in one day. I could easily see both conferences and their teams deciding to get us back by refusing to schedule us (balancing "the high road" vs. loss of revenue). Utah, with their new "superiority," could very easily join in. This would leave us with no regional games, no rivalry games, and no "average" games. Would we be able to construct a viable schedule?
Let's say BYU goes indy, but spurns the WAC-2, going to say the WCC for non-football. In this case, we have successfully shafted both the MWC and WAC in one day. I could easily see both conferences and their teams deciding to get us back by refusing to schedule us (balancing "the high road" vs. loss of revenue). Utah, with their new "superiority," could very easily join in. This would leave us with no regional games, no rivalry games, and no "average" games. Would we be able to construct a viable schedule?

