Kaveinga denied...

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/blogs/byusports/50134214-65/byu-kaveinga-uona-appeal.html.csp



Crap... but expected.

Douche move NCAA

That absolutely sucks....NCAA sucks.

I am fine with it. Could have used him, but having him 2011 and 2012 will be sweet.

Lawboy wrote:
I am fine with it. Could have used him, but having him 2011 and 2012 will be sweet.

That is the silver lining. We will get him when this young team is a little more seasoned.

We also get one heck of a leader and scout team linebacker this year, instead of only having him for 2 seasons.



It's silly to me that the NCAA would deny him but there's a silver lining.

Exactly, I forgot he had a redshirt, so at least he's not going to waste for a year.

I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

PurpleReign wrote:
I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

Lay off the Diet Coke ;) We said he'd contain Polk.



PurpleReign seems to be pulling a ZachSooners -- we've seen this pregame meltdown before.... the postgame is even more hilarious.

craigoscarson wrote:

I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

Lay off the Diet Coke ;) We said he'd contain Polk.



PurpleReign seems to be pulling a ZachSooners -- we've seen this pregame meltdown before.... the postgame is even more hilarious.

Whoa, hold up now. What part of what I said is wrong or non-factual? It's a direct quote from one of the previous threads we've had on here.

PurpleReign wrote:

PurpleReign wrote:
I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

Lay off the Diet Coke ;) We said he'd contain Polk.



PurpleReign seems to be pulling a ZachSooners -- we've seen this pregame meltdown before.... the postgame is even more hilarious.

Whoa, hold up now. What part of what I said is wrong or non-factual? It's a direct quote from one of the previous threads we've had on here.

(almost verbatim quote from one of you)

So I'm confused, is it a direct quote or only an almost verbatim quote?

Both.

PurpleReign wrote:

PurpleReign wrote:
I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

Lay off the Diet Coke ;) We said he'd contain Polk.



PurpleReign seems to be pulling a ZachSooners -- we've seen this pregame meltdown before.... the postgame is even more hilarious.

Whoa, hold up now. What part of what I said is wrong or non-factual? It's a direct quote from one of the previous threads we've had on here.

Blah blah blah... We still have Jordan Pendelton to know Locker's head off. Oops -- I mean "single-handedly contain".

PurpleReign wrote:
I guess this means he wont: "...single-handedly contain Locker..."?



(almost verbatim quote from one of you).

He will still be able to contain Locker, that's how good he is, just think how much better he would be if Kavenga were actually on the field! :D

Ha! Must be the next-gen type of player, with telekinetic powers 8)