How Washington Stacks Up With the Rest of the Pac-10

http://collegefootball.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1111985" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So, basically it says Washington has defensive question marks and will have a disappointing 6-6 or 7-5 season, and won't challenge for the PAC-10 title like their fans think they will.



Hopefully we beat them and they go on to win the conference.

Of course their fans think that they'll challenge for the title, they thought that two years ago, too.

Raiderboy wrote:
So, basically it says Washington has defensive question marks and will have a disappointing 6-6 or 7-5 season, and won't challenge for the PAC-10 title like their fans think they will.



Hopefully we beat them and they go on to win the conference.

Knowing our own history, we'll beat them and they'll go on to suck it up for the rest of the season.



Either that, or they'll play the game of their lives against us.

Italics wrote:

So, basically it says Washington has defensive question marks and will have a disappointing 6-6 or 7-5 season, and won't challenge for the PAC-10 title like their fans think they will.



Hopefully we beat them and they go on to win the conference.

Knowing our own history, we'll beat them and they'll go on to suck it up for the rest of the season.



Either that, or they'll play the game of their lives against us.

Or BYU will knock Locker out of the game and people will say it doesn't count or mean as much because they didn't have their best player. (ala OU)