Richins' (not Gooch for those who care) Case for Heaps

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/433327-byu-quarterback-time-to-choose" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Richins makes his case for Heaps as the starter. I agree with his points. they mirror mostly the points many of us have already made in our discussions.

Hate to burst your bubble, but this is actually written by Brett Richins:



http://deepshadesofblue.com/byu-quarterback-time-to-choose/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Bleacher Report evidently hasn't changed the source credit on any of their automatic article feeds from DSOB, and all of the recent DSOB articles written by Richins have been credited to Gooch.

snoscythe wrote:
Hate to burst your bubble, but this is actually written by Brett Richins:



http://deepshadesofblue.com/byu-quarterback-time-to-choose/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Bleacher Report evidently hasn't changed the source credit on any of their automatic article feeds from DSOB, and all of the recent DSOB articles written by Richins have been credited to Gooch.

I had not bubble to burst. No matter who wrote it, I think the points made are good ones. I will change the post heading. I know how you feel about headings that are not 100 percent accurate.

jonnylingo wrote:

Hate to burst your bubble, but this is actually written by Brett Richins:



http://deepshadesofblue.com/byu-quarterback-time-to-choose/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;



Bleacher Report evidently hasn't changed the source credit on any of their automatic article feeds from DSOB, and all of the recent DSOB articles written by Richins have been credited to Gooch.

I had not bubble to burst. No matter who wrote it, I think the points made are good ones. I will change the post heading. I know how you feel about headings that are not 100 percent accurate.

There's a HUGE difference between Gooch's and Richin's opinions. I think most would agree with that, including Gooch and Richins. Thanks for changing the topic to correctly attribute the opinion.