C
CrimsonCougSeveral folks have said they want the best guy on the field (or variants of that: the guy who will give us the best chance of winning, etc.)
Question:
You're the OC. Do you want to start
1. the guy most likely to give you the best season record (a static strategy). [You make a decision before the Washington game and stick to it the rest of the season, barring injury.]
2. the guy most likely to give you the best record the rest of the season (an adaptive strategy) [You're allowed to switch only once during the season]
3. the guy who can give you the best chance of winning the next game (a dynamic strategy) [You take it "one game at a time"]
As we argue about the name of the guy for each scenario, I wonder what people think the best strategy is. (We can also ignore or not continuity effects that switching might have).
Question:
You're the OC. Do you want to start
1. the guy most likely to give you the best season record (a static strategy). [You make a decision before the Washington game and stick to it the rest of the season, barring injury.]
2. the guy most likely to give you the best record the rest of the season (an adaptive strategy) [You're allowed to switch only once during the season]
3. the guy who can give you the best chance of winning the next game (a dynamic strategy) [You take it "one game at a time"]
As we argue about the name of the guy for each scenario, I wonder what people think the best strategy is. (We can also ignore or not continuity effects that switching might have).

