The QB Poll

snoscythe wrote:
The amount of debate on this board proves one thing only--it's a tight race.



This especially after the offense has lost its defacto captain in Unga and the coaches have acknowledged the leadership edge going to the Junior.

Ddawg wrote:
This is such a "shot in the dark" - because we are not at the practices actually watching. All the info. We are getting is 2nd hand & filtered. I'm taking a "wait & see" attitude. Either way - the right decision will be made. I expect changes to occur during the season as both QB's evolve & develop. No question - both QB's (Nelson & Heaps) are talented & bring real game to the table.

Mars wrote:


Anyway, over the first 11 practices Nelson threw for 103 yards and 1 TD- during an endzone drill (less than 10 passing yards a day- including days where he threw for 2 yards and 0 yards... not confidence-inducing for a kid who could potentially start against Washington... were Heaps injured), while Heaps threw for 5 TDs and approximately 550 yards. This is where most of the "Nelson got blown away" comments and thoughts were solidly formed and founded. Justifiably so. Heaps also had at least two throws of over 50 yards that were dropped by WRs. Not intercepted, dropped. I don't think Nelson could even hope to throw a ball that far, and opposing defenses will know that.

jonnylingo wrote:
In my mind nelson would be the less risky qb but more someone that would be adequate. Heaps seems like a qb that has way more upside and potential to really raise the team to new heights.



Seems to me that sooner or later jake is going to seperate himself substantially and take over the starting spot.



I think he should be eased in though. I want jake but think it seems more wise to start nelson absent jake putting some serious seperatiom between him and others come fall ball.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

snoscythe wrote:

In my mind nelson would be the less risky qb but more someone that would be adequate. Heaps seems like a qb that has way more upside and potential to really raise the team to new heights.



Seems to me that sooner or later jake is going to seperate himself substantially and take over the starting spot.



I think he should be eased in though. I want jake but think it seems more wise to start nelson absent jake putting some serious seperatiom between him and others come fall ball.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

I don't like the easing in idea if you are talking about a mid-season change. Utah tried doing a planned phase in last year, trading Terrance Cain's 7-1 starting record for Wynn's 3-2. I don't know that Cain would've made a difference in the TCU game, but it could've been the difference in the BYU game. If we're talking about any other position on the field, a mid-season change isn't horrible, but changing a QB is a paradigm shift for the entire offense. You need to pick your horse early on and get the entire team behind them. If it's Heaps, everyone needs to get behind him and let him make mistakes and grow, and if it's Nelson, everyone needs to get behind him and trust that the coaches have a good reason to have him on the field instead of Heaps. Using a phase-in just leaves too much room for uncertainty and second guessing.



If you need to phase someone in, a back-up position or a redshirt season are best. Don't plan to change your horse midrace.



That being said, if the guy you picked consistently fails to get the job done, that's what the pine is for.

Mars wrote:

This is such a "shot in the dark" - because we are not at the practices actually watching. All the info. We are getting is 2nd hand & filtered. I'm taking a "wait & see" attitude. Either way - the right decision will be made. I expect changes to occur during the season as both QB's evolve & develop. No question - both QB's (Nelson & Heaps) are talented & bring real game to the table.

Maybe that the "right" approach, to refuse to take sides or be in any QBs camp at all. I'm just too opinionated to go that route, personally. Besides, it's supposed to be more fun to have a sports opinion than not.

kitic77 wrote:

Anyway, over the first 11 practices Nelson threw for 103 yards and 1 TD- during an endzone drill (less than 10 passing yards a day- including days where he threw for 2 yards and 0 yards... not confidence-inducing for a kid who could potentially start against Washington... were Heaps injured), while Heaps threw for 5 TDs and approximately 550 yards. This is where most of the "Nelson got blown away" comments and thoughts were solidly formed and founded. Justifiably so.

Question? Why did Heaps numbers fall off towards the end of camp? Why did five of his seven TDs come during the first two weeks? Those questions about early vs late production can go both way. Again, who cares when they come? Did those three TDs count less because they came late in the spring ball period?



...I think two weeks into spring ball the race was definitely shaping up to be in Heaps' favor. But Nelson clearly raised his game and made it into a competition... I will say this, if fall camp starts the same way - with Heaps playing very well and Nelson struggling, I don't think the coaches will wait to see if Nelson can raise his game again. I think they would name Heaps the starter and start getting him ready for Washington. And I would fully agree and support that decision.