M
Mars" BYU is absolutely not joining the Pac-10 unless the existing conference landscape is dismantled and we end up with four super conferences â and maybe not even then. And Iâve heard that from multiple sources, those within the Pac-10 and those close to BYU officials. BYU was not viewed as a good fit in the mid-1990s when the league considered expansion, and I asked a well-placed source if there had been any change in that view. âNo change,â he said.
In fact, best I can tell, nobody in the Pac-10âs chain of command, from the CEOs down to the coaches, is interested in BYU for the following reasons:
* The presidents and chancellors of the secular Pac-10 schools are wary of joining forces with a church-affiliated school (any church-affiliated school).
* As it moves forward, the Pac-10 wants to increase its scheduling flexibility to provide more broadcast opportunities for networks. BYU would decrease flexibility because it doesnât play on Sundays.
* The potential TV revenue generated by BYUâs national appeal is not enough to overcome the above concerns â itâs not like BYU is Notre Dame. (Part of BYUâs national subscriber base, remember, already falls within the Pac-10 TV footprint.)
* The Pac-10 coaches and athletic directors arenât interested in sending their 18 years olds up against BYUâs post-Mission 25 year olds.
* BYU does not meet the Pac-10âs academic standards â itâs not a major research university. The Pac-10 CEOs consider Utah to be a much better academically, and the league wonât take both BYU and Utah; there arenât enough TV homes in the state to make the numbers work.
I repeat: Utah and BYU isnât happening, and BYU isnât happening, unless everything blows up. And probably not even then. "
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2010/05/12/pac-10-expansion-revisiting-the-brigham-young-issue/
In fact, best I can tell, nobody in the Pac-10âs chain of command, from the CEOs down to the coaches, is interested in BYU for the following reasons:
* The presidents and chancellors of the secular Pac-10 schools are wary of joining forces with a church-affiliated school (any church-affiliated school).
* As it moves forward, the Pac-10 wants to increase its scheduling flexibility to provide more broadcast opportunities for networks. BYU would decrease flexibility because it doesnât play on Sundays.
* The potential TV revenue generated by BYUâs national appeal is not enough to overcome the above concerns â itâs not like BYU is Notre Dame. (Part of BYUâs national subscriber base, remember, already falls within the Pac-10 TV footprint.)
* The Pac-10 coaches and athletic directors arenât interested in sending their 18 years olds up against BYUâs post-Mission 25 year olds.
* BYU does not meet the Pac-10âs academic standards â itâs not a major research university. The Pac-10 CEOs consider Utah to be a much better academically, and the league wonât take both BYU and Utah; there arenât enough TV homes in the state to make the numbers work.
I repeat: Utah and BYU isnât happening, and BYU isnât happening, unless everything blows up. And probably not even then. "

