M
Marshttp://universe.byu.edu/node/6259
Wow. :bug:
by Mars · 2/24/2010
snoscythe wrote:
What a joke. Complaining because the student paper gets the same level of access as the local media. Oh the humanity!
These guys need to get over themselves. Guess what--in the real world, if you represent some podunk bottom-feeder paper and the team you cover thinks you gave a misleading interview and pulled things out of context, there's going to be consequences. The baseball team doesn't do post-game interviews after away games because they'd rather get on the road? Seems like the professional newspapers are doing fine covering those games without crying like Nancy Kerrigan. The basketball and football teams put gag orders on players who cross a line "hurts the students?" How?
This kid needs to grow a pair and get over himself. You write for the least important paper that covers the programs--when you're a bottom feeder, you're going to have to eat some crap to survive. More people read your paper for the indignant opinions and police reports of streakers than the coverage of the baseball team. Get used to it....you're entering a dying profession.
Apparently BYU baseball coach Vance Law wonât allow his players or himself to be interviewed after away games. How is our baseball reporter supposed to give the fans a proper report on the baseball team if the reporter canât even talk to the team?
We wonât know how Heaps feels about spring camp until after the teamâs Sept. 4 game against Washington.
The BYU football team has a policy that bans any media from interviewing new freshman players until after the first game of the season.
Let me be very clear: The Daily Universe has no vendetta against any athlete or coach, nor does it hold a grudge against any employee of BYU Athletic Communications. But a problem arises when the athletics department or a coach feels the best way to get back at a perceived bias by the paper is to blacklist the student reporters who are trying to find stories that interest the BYU student body.
However, if you feel the article was unfair, how about talking to the reporter about some of the concerns you had?
Decisions like placing gag orders on Jonathan Tavernari and OâNeill Chambers, both of which happened last year, need to stop. It does nothing to protect the athletes and it wonât destroy The Daily Universe. The only thing it does is hurt the students and also BYU sports fans.
For sports like menâs volleyball and baseball, you need to realize that if we canât get access to coaches and athletes, then we might have no choice but to not cover your sports as much as you would like.
The Daily Universe has no vendetta against any athlete or coach, nor does it hold a grudge against any employee of BYU Athletic Communications.
Schmoe wrote:
You guys are quoting all kinds of things that I don't see anywhere in the article, all I saw was "WWAAAHHHH!!"
This is just one of several recent examples of some of the BYU athletic teams, along with BYU Athletic Communications, thinking itâs a good idea to protect its athletes from the media, and including The Daily Universe.:skeptic:
Mars wrote:
One of the quotes following the article was very succinct in pointing out how Graham Watson from ESPN twisted freshman O'Neil Chambers quotes to make it sound like he was insulting his fellow wide receivers. Some policies may seem stupider than others to outsiders, but all have been put in place by BYU and its coaches for a reason.
It's like the caution label on a ladder warning you not to secure it in manure. That sure seems stupid, but it wouldn't be there if that one dumb farmer hadn't broken his leg out in a cow pasture...
bigbluepuma wrote:
there is a chainsaw manufacturer that has a warning not to try to stop the chain with your genitals. :bug: :bug: :roll: :roll:
Mars wrote:there is a chainsaw manufacturer that has a warning not to try to stop the chain with your genitals. :bug: :bug: :roll: :roll:
Yeah, I got a great settlement out of that one!