Non-BCS Resurgence

I'd say at least 13 of them. I think this year's tournament will be pretty crazy with a lot of upsets and mid-majors wreaking havoc. There should be a lot more at-large mid-majors this year, which I'm happy about. I have won my work's bracket challenge the last two years but I'm not as confident this year. I'm calling Syracuse to win it all as of right now though.

Well, I think a few of those teams may get in, but only because of winning their conference championship. For instance, Utah State may get in as an at large, but it'll be close. They may have to depend on winning their conference.

I could see 11 or more getting in plus UTEP even though they sit at 58. I love the years when there isn't a clearly dominant team that everyone knows will win it all. IMO the best teams are Kansas, Kentucky, and Syracuse, but after that it's pretty open to debate. I look forward to a lot of upsets come March.

mizzoucoug wrote:
I could see 11 or more getting in plus UTEP even though they sit at 58. I love the years when there isn't a clearly dominant team that everyone knows will win it all. IMO the best teams are Kansas, Kentucky, and Syracuse, but after that it's pretty open to debate. I look forward to a lot of upsets come March.

March should be very fun.



At least half of those teams will get in. The teams with an RPI higher than 30 should bank on winning their conference tournament. As Mars pointed out, a #9 ranked Ohio State is going to push teams out of dance even with a worst record and RPI. Name recognition and conference affiliation have become the name of the game for getting an at large bids which is also evidenced by the dwindling number of "non-power conference" teams that get into the tournament every year.