S
snoscytheSMU's donors have stepped up and allowed SMU to make an offer to the Big XII that is shaking things up--SMU won't take any TV money for the first five years, and then will ease its way into full $$ membership over the following five years--in other words, pay nothing down, and we don't take our full share for a decade. I've heard from someone else that they've even hinted that they might be able to pay the Big XII a joining fee as well.
This could explain why Gary Patterson was suddenly vocal yesterday about wanting teams that make the conference better instead of teams who are looking for conference affiliation to make them better--I doubt he likes the idea of his next door neighbor (40 miles away) joining the club.
http://sportsday.dallasnews.com/college-sports/collegesports/2016/08/03/gary-patterson-expanding-big-12-conferences-job-make-university-better
If SMU is offering no-money down or actually offering to buy into the Big XII, I don't think BYU can or will match that incentive.
This could explain why Gary Patterson was suddenly vocal yesterday about wanting teams that make the conference better instead of teams who are looking for conference affiliation to make them better--I doubt he likes the idea of his next door neighbor (40 miles away) joining the club.
If SMU is offering no-money down or actually offering to buy into the Big XII, I don't think BYU can or will match that incentive.

