1 more to go and undefeated MWC (Bowl Challenge clinched?)

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/16343161/ns/sports-college_football/?ns=sports-college_football



Conference-by-conference bowl records

How each faring during the postseason games



MWC (5) AF,BYU,TCU,Utah,Wyom 4-0 1.000

Big East (6) Cincy,Pitt,Rut,UConn,USF,WVU 2-0 1.000

Independents (1) Navy 1-0 1.000

Sun Belt (2) MidTen,Troy 1-0 1.000

Big 12 (8) ISU,Mizzou,Neb,OU,OklaSt,Texas,TexA&M,TT 3-2 .600

Big Ten (7) Iowa,MichSt,Minn,NWstrn,OSU,PSU,Wis 1-1 .500

ACC (7) BC,Clem,FSU,GT,Miami,UNC,VT 2-3 .400

C-USA (6) ECU,Hou,Marsh,SMU,SoMiss,UCF 2-3 .400

Pac-10 (7) Ariz,Cal,Ore,OreSt,Stan,UCLA,USC 2-4 .333

SEC (10) Ala,Ark,Aub,Flor,Geor,Ky,LSU,Miss,SCar,Tenn 1-2 .333

WAC (4) BoiseSt,FresSt,Idaho,Nev 1-2 .333

MAC (5) BGreen,CMich,NIU,Ohio,Tem 0-3 .000

MWC 4-0, not 3-0 ya goof!

Schmoe wrote:
MWC 4-0, not 3-0 ya goof!

your beef is with nbc, I just cut and paste

Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

With the exception of Wyoming, the MWC has not just won thier games, they have mutilated thier opponents. It hasn't been close.

Schmoe wrote:
Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

they just updated it

frdbtr wrote:
With the exception of Wyoming, the MWC has not just won thier games, they have mutilated thier opponents. It hasn't been close.

TCU better make sure they do the same. I want to see BSU down 30 at halftime.

After what the conference has done in the bowls, if the BCS ran the numbers after the bowls TCU could be #1.

And three of the MWC's victories were by double digits and two of them were by three or more touchdowns.

scott715 wrote:
After what the conference has done in the bowls, if the BCS ran the numbers after the bowls TCU could be #1.

Which is exactly why they don't run the BCS numbers after the bowls. If they did that, USC would have been #1 in the BCS rankings at the end of 2003, above LSU who won the BCS Championship game.

craigoscarson wrote:

Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

they just updated it

I still damn them.

Schmoe wrote:

Schmoe wrote:
Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

they just updated it

I still damn them.

Why are you stopping their progression?

kiwibacon wrote:

craigoscarson wrote:

Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

they just updated it

I still damn them.

Why are you stopping their progression?

Because he read Arguing with Idiots and learned about the evils of Progressivism. ;)

Schmoe wrote:
Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

Get it right Schmoe!!!!



http://blogs.amctv.com/movie-blog/planet-of-apes-twist.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">



Kiwibacon damn you! Kiwibacon damn you all to UNIVERSITY OF UTAH! :crazy:

snoscythe wrote:

After what the conference has done in the bowls, if the BCS ran the numbers after the bowls TCU could be #1.

Which is exactly why they don't run the BCS numbers after the bowls. If they did that, USC would have been #1 in the BCS rankings at the end of 2003, above LSU who won the BCS Championship game.

There are people that do compile those same numbers. It'll be interesting to see if and when TCU rolls Boise State.



Texas looked a lot better after Nebraska anihilated Arizona though; and Bama is still a legit #1 until proven otherwise.



Bottom line, this bowl season shows how much TCU at least deserved a shot. What more could they have done?

declocoug wrote:

With the exception of Wyoming, the MWC has not just won thier games, they have mutilated thier opponents. It hasn't been close.

TCU better make sure they do the same. I want to see BSU down 30 at halftime.

Oh, don't worry. TCU is going to win this game. BSU is good but TCU should be in the BCS championship game.

I would like to see if our conference passes up another conference or two. Like the ACC or Pac-10.

snoscythe wrote:

Schmoe wrote:

Schmoe wrote:
Damn you, NBC, damn you!!

they just updated it

I still damn them.

Why are you stopping their progression?

Because he read Arguing with Idiots and learned about the evils of Progressivism. ;)

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



I knew there was something about those BCS people I did not like.

The only conferences that can possibly win the Bowl Challenge cup outright now are the MWC, Big Ten and Big East. If TCU loses to BSU and the SEC wins out, it could TIE for the cup. If TCU beats BSU, the only conference that can win it is the Big East-who has 1 more bowl team than the MWC.



All other conferences have been mathematically eliminated.



We need both the Big 10 and Big East to lose at least 2 games-Big 10 already lost one and the Big East is 2-0.

Isn't the Sunbelt 1-0 with one game left? Is there a minimum number of games rule?