hawkwing wrote:
BYU believes they can control the narrative by never releasing any information, or doing so begrudgingly weeks or months after the fact, they live in an unrealistic world where if they don't talk about something it shouldn't be talked about.
Guess what, when a kid is forced to clean out his locker every single one of his teammates knows about it, so does every staff member and student janitor. The word is going to get out and whether it's talked about on CougarCorner or in Elder's Quorum by a teammates dad to his friends everyone will soon know about it.
If BYU wants to mitigate the damage they should take a proactive PR approach as I'm sure Gunk can talk about and take charge of the story, not try to cover it up and bury it.
I'm kind of feeling the same as hawkwing. If someone is off the team, that was on the team, then since certain college sports depend on fans for support to exist, then be up front. I don't have any problem with BYU saying that due to unforeseen circumstances, such and such a player was released from the team. We need to be responsible to respect individuals right to comment or not. It's not our right or business of the "why" of these situations, but it is appropriate for fans to know that certain players are no longer part of a team. If it wasn't for the fans of these sports, these athletes would not be receiving a scholarship and expenses, coaches wouldn't be receiving exorbitant salaries, etc. so this doesn't happen in a vacuum.
This has been an odd situation where a local sports radio host noted that there was relatively bad news coming and that began the speculation. That has happened EVERYWHERE there are people involved. It's not just a BYU thing.
The oddity of this situation is that someone commented in social media that Koroma's locker had been cleaned out, insinuating that he may not currently being an active member of the team. If that is true, then BYU should issue a statement. It seems a bit unusual that this many days later we have not had confirmation or denial if that fact is true. It could be that both items are not related, but based on past history, they most likely are.