G
GuestExcerpts from the story:
It was anything but. Despite the headlines that say the Patriots werenât proved to be involved in wrongdoing in the long-awaited Wells Report, they were. Just because it was lower-level employees doesnât make the Pats any less culpable. No, the report didnât reveal some massive Watergate-style cover-up, but told us what we generally expected: Some assistant managers were messing around with the football, likely at the behest of Tom Brady. Itâs not cause for a football death penalty, but itâs still cheating and shows the Pats havenât learned a thing in the decade since their dalliance with illegal videotaping of teams.
...
Brady doesnât get to make that call. It appears he cheated and he did it knowingly. He should, and will, get suspended (probably for 2-4 games) because he knew the deflation of balls was against the rules and apparently stayed involved with it anyway. Cheating isnât a zero-sum game like some believe. There can be degrees of it and Brady is probably at the lower end, but itâs cheating nonetheless. In the 1960s or 80s, such a move might considered creative, like those moves above or putting a little Vaseline on the baseball just to get some break. But everyoneâs far too serious about everything these days, especially sports, and thatâs why this excerpt from Page 2 of the 243-page Wells Report is all that matters:https://usatftw.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/screen-shot-2015-05-06-at-1-31-29-pm.png?w=1000 " alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
In laymanâs terms: The Patriots (probably) cheated.

