Obama Lied About Benghazi

New York Post

By Edward Klein, June 22, 2014



In his new book, “Blood Feud,” journalist Edward Klein gets inside the dysfunctional, jealous relationship between Bill and Hillary Clinton and Barack and Michelle Obama. Here, he explains what happened the night of the Benghazi attack.



By 10 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2012, when Hillary Clinton received a call from President Obama, she was one of the most thoroughly briefed officials in Washington on the unfolding disaster in Benghazi, Libya.



She knew that Ambassador Christopher Stevens and a communications operator were dead, and that the attackers had launched a well-coordinated mortar assault on the CIA annex, which would cost the lives of two more Americans.



http://nypost.com/2014/06/22/clinton-bristled-at-benghazi-deception-book/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

What else is new?



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">

Agreed. But, this is different - vastly different.



This insight comes from a Hillary Clinton "legal advisor" that tells the inside scoop on "the" phone call (at 10 pm, while the attacks continued on for hours), directly from Barack Obama to Hillary Clinton; in which Obama asks Clinton lie for him with a fabricated story about the infamous "video."



The question is: Where did Hillary's legal advisor get this information from? The logical assumption is - directly from Hillary. But, wouldn't a legal advisor be legally obligated to keep this privileged information private? Why would a Hillary "insider" (her people are vigorously loyal to Hillary) reveal such info? Is it actually a planned leak so Hillary can distance herself from Obama and the Benghazi debacle? What about the fallout for Hillary - because she participated in and promoted the video lie.



However it pans out, it's a huge revelation.

Yep, it's a huge revalation, because this book is suggesting that the false narrative for the video came directly from the president.

SpiffCoug wrote:
Yep, it's a huge revalation, because this book is suggesting that the false narrative for the video came directly from the president.

Bingo! And, he personally called Hillary and gave her a direct order to promote the lie.

What's interesting is I think Hillary would be much more respected now if she had resigned instead of deciding to agree to lie to the American public.



But she and Bill knew if the true story got out, Romney would win the election and they knew he would likely be able to turn the economy around making him an extremely formidable incumbent in 2016.



But, if this story is true, it shows her true character. And that is a character that is perfectly willing to not tell the truth. And to not even tell the truth in a life and death situation.



If you can readily lie about life and death then there really isn't anything you are willing to be honest about.



She and Obama are wicked people seeking power and dominion.



Helaman 6:21-25

21 But behold, Satan did stir up the hearts of the more part of the Nephites, insomuch that they did unite with those bands of robbers, and did enter into their covenants and their oaths, that they would protect and preserve one another in whatsoever difficult circumstances they should be placed, that they should not suffer for their murders, and their plunderings, and their stealings.



22 And it came to pass that they did have their signs, yea, their secret signs, and their secret words; and this that they might distinguish a brother who had entered into the covenant, that whatsoever wickedness his brother should do he should not be injured by his brother, nor by those who did belong to his band, who had taken this covenant.



23 And thus they might murder, and plunder, and steal, and commit whoredoms and all manner of wickedness, contrary to the laws of their country and also the laws of their God.



24 And whosoever of those who belonged to their band should reveal unto the world of their wickedness and their abominations, should be tried, not according to the laws of their country, but according to the laws of their wickedness, which had been given by Gadianton and Kishkumen.



25 Now behold, it is these secret oaths and covenants which Alma commanded his son should not go forth unto the world, lest they should be a means of bringing down the people unto destruction.

I think this explains her response when asked about Benghazi "what difference does it make?" She knew it was a lie.

Which is sad, because it makes a great deal of difference. If they were, as she put it, just some guys out one night looking to kill Americans you will have an entirely different response going forward than if it was a planned and coordinated attack.



It is very difficult to prevent certain types of purely random events. Events that require planning allow for infiltration and discovery before hand.



Her response also showed her inability to correctly judge situations and circumstances.

There is yet another possibility here that the Clintons are completely lying about this in order to cover her missteps and throw Obama under the bus. Obama is already wildly unpopular and she could use this to blame her own massive misunderstandings and failures (if that's what happened) on a direct order from Obama to lie.

Good point. Even though she is thoroughly dishonest, it is relatively easy to portray another thoroughly dishonest person with even more dishonesty.



It's highly possible she is dishonestly throwing this dishonesty onto the dishonesty of the presdient in an attempt - that hopefully will fail - to dishonestly portray herself as quite honest.



Honestly!

SpiffCoug wrote:
Good point. Even though she is thoroughly dishonest, it is relatively easy to portray another thoroughly dishonest person with even more dishonesty.



It's highly possible she is dishonestly throwing this dishonesty onto the dishonesty of the presdient in an attempt - that hopefully will fail - to dishonestly portray herself as quite honest.



Honestly!

Exactly.

hawkwing wrote:
There is yet another possibility here that the Clintons are completely lying about this in order to cover her missteps and throw Obama under the bus. Obama is already wildly unpopular and she could use this to blame her own massive misunderstandings and failures (if that's what happened) on a direct order from Obama to lie.

I think there is a great deal of truth in your post Hawk.



My feelings:

1. Both Hillary and Barack knew the video story was a lie from the "git go."

2. It didn't matter. The deception only needed to last 60 days until the Nov. pres. election. Winning the re-election was was paramount. With luck, the American people would "buy it" and move on. Short political memories are wonderful.

3. The fact that both the Obama's and the Clintons are complicit in the formation and vigorous promotion of the Benghazi video lie, it speaks volumes about their character and their contempt for the American people. All that matters is gathering and maintaining power. Honor, integrity, character are all sacrificed for the ultimate goal - attaining and maintaining power.

3a. Remember, a key component of Obama's re-election was that he had "decimated" al-Qaeda under his leadership. The Benghazi slaughter exposed that lie. We now know that since 2010, terrorist groups and activity have increased 58% (Rand Corp). The exact opposite of what Obama and his re-election team were claiming about Terrorism in the world was happening. Terrorism was strengthening and expanding by leaps and bounds. The proof is occurring right now in the Middle East as Syria and Iraq are being dealt heavy blows - by those decimated terrorists.

4. Now that the pollsters show that the majority of the American people do not believe the Obama/Clinton Benghazi fabrication - it is critical for Hillary to distance herself from the White House lie.



Good luck to Hillary in that effort. I suspect that dog won't hunt.



Note: Terrorism increased 58% since 2010 according to Rand.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/terrorist-groups-rise-58-since-2010/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Ddawg wrote:

There is yet another possibility here that the Clintons are completely lying about this in order to cover her missteps and throw Obama under the bus. Obama is already wildly unpopular and she could use this to blame her own massive misunderstandings and failures (if that's what happened) on a direct order from Obama to lie.

I think there is a great deal of truth in your post Hawk.



My feelings:

1. Both Hillary and Barack knew the video story was a lie from the "git go."

2. It didn't matter. The deception only needed to last 60 days until the Nov. pres. election. Winning the re-election was was paramount. With luck, the American people would "buy it" and move on. Short political memories are wonderful.

3. The fact that both the Obama's and the Clintons are complicit in the formation and vigorous promotion of the Benghazi video lie, it speaks volumes about their character and their contempt for the American people. All that matters is gathering and maintaining power. Honor, integrity, character are all sacrificed for the ultimate goal - attaining and maintaining power.

4. Now that the pollsters show that the majority of the American people do not believe the Obama/Clinton Benghazi fabrication - it is critical for Hillary to distance herself from the White House lie.



Good luck to Hillary in that effort. I suspect that dog won't hunt.

Exactly what I was thinking.

The casualty here is faith and trust in the U.S. Federal govt. A new Fox News poll reveals only 37% of Americans trust the Federal govt. after these scandals (Benghazi, IRS, NSA).



"Fox Poll: Just 37% of Americans Trust Government After Scandals"

http://www.newsmax.com/US/poll-government-trust-low/2014/05/15/id/571656/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

One other purpose of the video is/was to sow confusion. It has completely obfuscated the situation. It was designed to spead the "fog of war" as far and wide as possible so that when the truth became known, people and voters would be so confused that they wouldn't know what to think so they would just move on and ignore it because that's much easier to do than think about what happened, learn what the gov't did and think about the consequences.

Yeah - here's a sampling of those confused, idiot voters.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRkFDcX_72c

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/06/150293-dan-bongino-watching-real-time-collapse-big-government-model/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino Sears Big Gov’t To A Crisp In Scalding Hot Facebook Post

We are watching, in real time, the collapse of the big-government model on which the house of liberalism has been built. The only question remaining is, when will those on the far left accept the results, rather than the intentions of the big government model?



President Obama ran on the idea that a big government can solve big problems, yet this model has not only not solved any of our big problems, but it has created new ones, while aggravating old ones created by prior administrations.



Then he backed it up with some powerful evidence:



Think about where we find ourselves. We are in the midst of a border crisis on our southern border, a civil war in Iraq, an aggressive expansion of Russian territory, a historically unpopular healthcare initiative, record numbers of Americans both outside of our workforce and receiving disability payments from the government, a crisis where our own IRS admits to targeting Americans, then pleads the 5th, then “loses” only the emails of the suspects involved, destroys their hard-drives and tells us nothing is wrong.



And where is our President on these issues? He is issuing public statements on how he disagrees with the name of an NFL team.