Wickchad84087 wrote:
So we lost to number 10 and now number 5, but we beat number 3. Should we be concerned about number 6-9 on our list?
Absolutely! And I'd take this schedule any day over old WAC and MWC schedules. Exciting, competitive games every week. And, even at 1-2, we still have some exciting football to look forward to. Utah St., Georgia Tech, Boise St., Notre Dame, Wisconsin. Heck, even Houston is undefeated still. And BYU will have a chance to win every one of these games.
Also, though 10-win seasons are fun, the WAC/MWC competition has given much of Cougar nation a false reality of where BYU's program lies. We are definitely a couple of notches ahead of the average MWC team, but we are also a couple of notches below the top performers. And that is fine.
But, suddenly, independence brought national expectations - I think our expectations outpaced reality by a step or two.
Wickchad84087 wrote:
If we redid this list now, where would Virginia be and where would Texas be? I think Utah still is right at 5.
Too early to tell on the Wahoos. They got it handed to them by the (legitimate) No. 2 Ducks, and then handed it to a mediocre FCS team. I think this weekend's game at Pitt will tell us whether we should regard the August 31 game as an outlier (either way).
Texas had a decent game in their win over Kansas St and while battling injuries. I also expect them to win on the road at Iowa St. The Red River Rivalry will show us whether Texas is as bad as we made them look just 9 short days ago. Hopefully Ash is healthy by then.
It's also interesting to see that Notre Dame and Wisconsin are barely ranked. There's still a strong possibility that the 2012 schedule turns out more difficult than 2013.