Archived Topic

Rank the 2013 Schedule

by SpiffCoug · 7/22/2013

Advertisement
S
SpiffCoug
And now the rankings get interesting. I think an argument can be made for ANY of the remaining games being the MOST difficult.



Here is the 2013 schedule so far from most to least difficult:



1. ???

2. ???

3. ???

4. ???

5. ???

6. ???

7. vs Georgia Tech (86%)

8. vs Middle Tennessee St (64%)

9. at Nevada (52%)

10. at Virginia (58%)

11. at Houston (38%)

12. vs Idaho St (92%)
S
SpiffCoug
I think Utah St takes a big step backwards with the loss of Gary Anderson.
S
snoscythe
I think Texas is a paper tiger, and I don't think USU is going to be as far down as most are projecting.
S
stuckinbig10country
If we were doing this poll for any other team except for BYU, the answer would be Utah. Utah is going to be terrible this year. But since this is a BYU poll, I picked Texas. First home game. Big time atmosphere. Utah State in Logan is dicey and BSU could be really good this year.
C
Cougs_Rule
SpiffCoug wrote:
I think Utah St takes a big step backwards with the loss of Gary Anderson.


I mostly agree with Spiff. At least a step back, if not more. And Byu offense improves. Usu doesn't have horses to keep up with Go fast, go furious.

Until we beat Utah.....are they really going to be worse?

The Horns might, MIGHT be worse than their 5th ranking, but they stii have athletes and "speed kills." UT Is as tough as U to beat. But both are up next. And maybe Wisconsin. I think they stand still and don't take a step forward nor back. Still tough at Camp Randall, but not unbeatable.
Advertisement
S
SpiffCoug
The great thing about this schedule is that while it is difficult I don't think there are any guaranteed losses. I think every game is winnable.
S
snoscythe
Cougs_Rule wrote:
The Horns might, MIGHT be worse than their 5th ranking, but they stii have athletes and "speed kills." UT Is as tough as U to beat. But both are up next. And maybe Wisconsin. I think they stand still and don't take a step forward nor back. Still tough at Camp Randall, but not unbeatable.


Texas' defense has been in constant decline since Diaz took the reins, and there's nothing to indicate much improvement--they've always had top-tier athletes, so this problem won't be solved with new personnel. I expect their run and scoring defense to remain #64 or lower (bottom half of FBS).



As for the offense, who knows what is going on there. It was here-and-there with Applewhite and Harsin as "co-offensive coordinators," but Harsin left and now Applewhite has a new co-O coord in a career WR coach. Mack Brown also indicated his disappointment with the lack of consistency from game to game and has directed them to return to the Colt McCoy -era spread offense, so not only is Applewhite adjusting to a new co-, but he's also being bumped out of the playbook he designed and into someone else's playbook. It's a sketchy situation (see also: Utah's offensive coordinator intrigue).
Y
YNot
Gary Andersen = Defense. He is gone. BYU scores at least 24 in 2013.



Matt Wells = Offense (well, at least against the WAC)

* 2012 Note - USU averaged 40+ points versus WAC; 30+ points versus weak MWC (UNLV, CSU); 14 points versus BYU, Utah (overtime), and Wisconsin



See a pattern? The Defense will hold the Aggies to 17 points or fewer.



Result = BYU 24+, Aggies 17-
H
Hookem
I hope this doesn't appear to be trolling. I'm so bored and in need of some decent football talk that I saw some of the comments on this thread and wanted to add my two cents. Especially since I know a little about that Texas team.


snoscythe wrote:
I think Texas is a paper tiger, and I don't think USU is going to be as far down as most are projecting.


This is a very fair assessment. In fact, I'd say that at least half, if not two-thirds, of UT faithful share the same sentiment. There hasn't been a lot to brag about the last three years.



What's most upsetting about this is that we've played the most freshman (true) in college football the last two years. We have 19 starters returning this year, and we're being picked to finish fourth in the conference!?! We should be top three in the country this year with the talent and depth that we have on this team right now.



This is a direct reflection on Mack Brown, and his seat, despite what he and Dodds are saying, is very very hot. If we lose to you guys the wheels will likely start to come off for ol' Mack. I personally am ready for some house cleaning, top to bottom, in all three major sports, starting at the top with Dodds.
H
Hookem
snoscythe wrote:



Texas' defense has been in constant decline since Diaz took the reins, and there's nothing to indicate much improvement--they've always had top-tier athletes, so this problem won't be solved with new personnel. I expect their run and scoring defense to remain #64 or lower (bottom half of FBS).




Very accurate stmt, regarding Diaz. Texas' struggles last year on defense had more to do with scheme than anything else. We have the athletes, and we have the coaching as far as the assistants. Diaz on the otherhand has been a disaster.


snoscythe wrote:
for the offense, who knows what is going on there. It was here-and-there with Applewhite and Harsin as "co-offensive coordinators," but Harsin left and now Applewhite has a new co-O coord in a career WR coach. Mack Brown also indicated his disappointment with the lack of consistency from game to game and has directed them to return to the Colt McCoy -era spread offense, so not only is Applewhite adjusting to a new co-, but he's also being bumped out of the playbook he designed and into someone else's playbook. It's a sketchy situation (see also: Utah's offensive coordinator intrigue).


Don't put too much into the new offense. It's virtually the same playbook, but has been simplified to leave most of the same personnel on the field to be more uptempo. . Harsin's offense was becoming to easy to read for any decent DC, based on the personnel on the field. If certain skill players were on the field for Texas, a good DC with good scouting would be able to decide which defense best suited the situation.



The difference between this years offense, and last years, would be best described if you were to watch the Oregon St game in the Alamo Bowl. We were the same basic offense in the first half, but in the second half, we moved to an uptempo offense. Once we did that,we were able to move the ball. It also played to Ash's strengths as well.



Also, as far as Wyatt being the Co-OC. Wyatt is an exceptional recruiter and WR coach, and has been an OC. This was nothing more than a move by Mack to appease Wyatt into staying and to give the perception that staff was solid. When in reality, from what I've been told, the most of the staff nearly left last year before and after the bowl game. This includes the defensive assistants as well as Major, Wyatt and others on the offense.



Also, don't be deceived into thinking that Major is some young pup who's just getting his feet wet. He's been the glue that's held this team together. Mack has depended more on Major than anyone else the last 3 years. Question is, will Mack let Major do his thing?



The same was true for Harsin, and he bailed first chance he got to Arky St, w/o even stepping foot on campus from what I've heard. He was sick of coaching under Mack and he saw a sinking ship...I hope he was wrong, but I haven't seen or heard anything to make me think different.



From what I've been told, one would think that Major is the acting HC, and is running the show behind the scenes. I could go into much greater detail, but I doubt that you'd be all that interested.



Fact of the matter is, is that while the staff is very excited about the team as a whole, their seats are very hot, and they're coaching for their professional lives this season. This team on the inside appears to be very shaky. We could have a great year, or we could implode, and it could be a very long season with Mack and co. on their way out.



You guys could be the catalyst for all of that...
Advertisement
H
Hookem
Sorry for the long post above. Man, I'm so bored...
Y
Y 4 Ever
SpiffCoug wrote:
The great thing about this schedule is that while it is difficult I don't think there are any guaranteed losses. I think every game is winnable.


I agree. We will be in every game - or at least should be.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
Y
Y 4 Ever
I GUARANTEE a crushing victory over the :utard: , so they get my vote



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
C
Cougarbib
Hookem wrote:
Sorry for the long post above. Man, I'm so bored...


I thought it was interesting. I wish we could get a classy fan of every opponent to come in and give us the scoop on their team - a balanced, realistic view. Your comments may even fall to the pessimistic side. If we got that from every visiting fan, it would pump up our Church of the Undefeated Season thread.



I thought Texas was showing improvement last year and expect to see continued improvement this year. I just hope the altitude gets to them when they come to Provo. Experience matters and those young Texas players will all be a year older and wiser.
C
Cougarbib
Y 4 Ever wrote:
I GUARANTEE a crushing victory over the :utard: , so they get my vote



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">


Although I am not ready to guarantee a win here or even vs about 10 of our opponents until I see what we have in coaching, OL, Kicker, Punter, FB, TE, and DB areas, I have voted U the last 2 rounds and now make that 3 rounds.
Advertisement
C
Cougs_Rule
Wow, Bib. Do you know something about the U this year or are you just trying to prove your blue-self?
C
Cougarbib
Cougs_Rule wrote:
Wow, Bib. Do you know something about the U this year or are you just trying to prove your blue-self?


The U has been and will continue to be a below average to average PAC team annually. Sure - they could get good fortune once in a while and be an average to above average PAC team - but that is about it.



Being in PAC helps their recruiting a bit - a bit like it helps A, ASU, maybe CAL, whom I see as peers. More than it helps WSU and C who are a bit inferior. Certainly not as much as it helps maybe CAL, UCLA, UW, Stanford, Oregon, or USC - all of which have huge TV markets, prestigious academics, or NIKE as a key booster. U cannot compete with that. Thus U will almost always be bottom half.



Having said that - BYU would fit in similarly if in PAC until Provo and Church demographics change substantially. They are changing - but have a long way to go.



I expect another nail biter vs U this season.
M
mizzoucoug
I say Boise because of familiarity, they won't be much better this year, and we get them at home. I actually am surprised by the USU vote. They have a good team even though they lost GA. I'm quite worried about that game considering they could very easily be on a 3-game winning streak against us and it's in Logan. No team in America hates BYU more than USU. Even Utes don't carry the same disdain imo.
H
Hookem
Cougarbib wrote:
Sorry for the long post above. Man, I'm so bored...


I thought it was interesting. I wish we could get a classy fan of every opponent to come in and give us the scoop on their team - a balanced, realistic view. Your comments may even fall to the pessimistic side. If we got that from every visiting fan, it would pump up our Church of the Undefeated Season thread.



I thought Texas was showing improvement last year and expect to see continued improvement this year. I just hope the altitude gets to them when they come to Provo. Experience matters and those young Texas players will all be a year older and wiser.


You're right. That was pretty pessimistic. That's one thing that has always agitated me about Texas fans, is the negativity. Guess I'm now the pot calling the kettle black in that regard.
S
snoscythe
Hookem wrote:
Hookem wrote:
Sorry for the long post above. Man, I'm so bored...


I thought it was interesting. I wish we could get a classy fan of every opponent to come in and give us the scoop on their team - a balanced, realistic view. Your comments may even fall to the pessimistic side. If we got that from every visiting fan, it would pump up our Church of the Undefeated Season thread.



I thought Texas was showing improvement last year and expect to see continued improvement this year. I just hope the altitude gets to them when they come to Provo. Experience matters and those young Texas players will all be a year older and wiser.


You're right. That was pretty pessimistic. That's one thing that has always agitated me about Texas fans, is the negativity. Guess I'm now the pot calling the kettle black in that regard.


I know and hang out with a lot of UT fans--I'm a Baylor fan myself, so we do a lot of Big XII talk. While Texas had their share of pessimistic fans, I don't know of many reality-rooted Longhorn fans that haven't turned pessimistic the last couple of years with how Mack Brown has been running his empire in Austin. One of my buddies put it best: "The worst thing that ever happened to Mack Brown was winning a national championship, and then losing in the NCG." Something in that loss unhinged Brown, who already was already wearing a bit thin on staff and players. One of the best indications of how backwards the Mack Brown -- University of Texas relationship is comes from the name of the official football team website:



http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Page 1 of 2
This is an archived topic from the original CougarCorner forum. New replies are not accepted.