S
scott715comes from a prep school in Carson CA. Non LDS from Lousianna. Loves to run. Looks to be a pretty good fit if he can adapt to D1 level.
by scott715 · 5/13/2013
snoscythe wrote:
I gotta say that neither of these signings (Bartely and the WF kid) excite me very much. It feels like we're replacing Delgado with Delgado, and Carlino with Carlino...
Gunk wrote:I gotta say that neither of these signings (Bartely and the WF kid) excite me very much. It feels like we're replacing Delgado with Delgado, and Carlino with Carlino...
I would gladly take another Carlino. I'll pass on another Delgado.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
tmoney35 wrote:snoscythe wrote:
I gotta say that neither of these signings (Bartely and the WF kid) excite me very much. It feels like we're replacing Delgado with Delgado, and Carlino with Carlino...
I would gladly take another Carlino. I'll pass on another Delgado.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
If you keep signing "shooters", eventually one of them is bound be able to actually shoot...right?
snoscythe wrote:
I gotta say that neither of these signings (Bartely and the WF kid) excite me very much. It feels like we're replacing Delgado with Delgado, and Carlino with Carlino...
golong wrote:
Skepticism is fine, but based on what? I believe both these signees will contribute in significant ways at BYU. Carlino can play and shoot and play the point; yes he has some improving to do, but I think we'll see big improvement this year. His biggest fault was being unwilling to just huck up shots he should not be taking; hopefully Rose can school him in that regard.
Bartley could be the first guy off the bench this year (since Davies will not be getting into foul trouble the first three minutes of every game). Rose now has a couple more scholarships to give, he must find a serious big guy to play the middle, we are still seriously weak there.
Gunk wrote:
His performance in the NIT was amazing.
snoscythe wrote:His performance in the NIT was amazing.
And his regular season performance (or lack thereof), was a significant reason why we were in the NIT.
BYULV wrote:Gunk wrote:
His performance in the NIT was amazing.
And his regular season performance (or lack thereof), was a significant reason why we were in the NIT.
Actually, he was one of our most consistent players during WCC play. Pre-Conf he was really stinking it up and faded a little at the end of conference.
BYULV wrote:Gunk wrote:
His performance in the NIT was amazing.
And his regular season performance (or lack thereof), was a significant reason why we were in the NIT.
Actually, he was one of our most consistent players during WCC play. Pre-Conf he was really stinking it up and faded a little at the end of conference.
snoscythe wrote:snoscythe wrote:His performance in the NIT was amazing.
And his regular season performance (or lack thereof), was a significant reason why we were in the NIT.
Actually, he was one of our most consistent players during WCC play. Pre-Conf he was really stinking it up and faded a little at the end of conference.
Where do you find consistency in the WCC play? His game log is absolutely schizophrenic:
WCC points each game:
21, 22, 13, 13, 16, 11, 11, 24, 12, 28, 9, 10, 10, 9, 2, 7, 11, 13
WCC assists each game:
5, 4, 4, 8, 5, 6, 4, 6, 4, 6, 4, 3, 7, 5, 2, 2, 7, 2
WCC turnovers each game:
4, 1, 0, 0, 6, 0, 4, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 2, 5, 2, 9, 4
WCC FG% each game:
47, 53, 50, 36, 50, 36, 36, 59, 27, 59, 28, 33, 67, 25, 20, 27, 67, 46
WCC 3P% each game:
50, 33, 75, 25, 50, 17, 14, 100, 33, 50, 14, 25, 100, 14, 0, 33, 50
To my mind a guy is consisent if his coach can say, whatever happens we know we can count on so-and-so for xx points/assists every night. How do you fill in those blanks for Carlino based on his WCC play?