This is just balderdash. We can't know for sure the intent behind this.
So, since we are left to guess, because this is more veiled half-messages--
If this is about "learning from the Lark" situation, its bunk, classic Bronco, late-to-learn and then over-apply a remedy that belonged in a different context.
If its based solely and precisely on "seniority" as the main driving force, and applied to the whole team, this portends bad things for the program. Better, younger players blocked by the need to "Earn Bronco's TRUST".
If its Robert Anae acting unilaterally, and contextually relative to QB's, so beit. He's the boss; he's new and he wants a tabla rosa making everyone earn their place, without prejudice or bias from the previous regime. In which case, why didn't he just say this? I could much more readily accept an "open" competition. But to say Munns has "earned" #1, he has had to establish some criteria. And I guess it must be on time in program because Hill would have more actual PT. But then again, none of them have experience in Anaes system.
If this is Jason Beck acting unilaterally, whatever. A stupid, non-Jedi mind trick that is just sophomoric.
If Anae's offense is high powered, high speed, with a mobile QB, this is almost mocking Jason Munns or building false hope.
What a farce. Whatever. play your little game. waist reps on a player who won't pan out and let's move forward.
BTW, I have it on very good, eyes on authority that Hill has his speed and mobility back. Not that he wouldn't be protected and restricted from running in spring.