S
stgeorgefanFor starting Riley Nelson vs the bowl team.... Lets see who gets it right
My guess:
"Riley has played hard and has earned the start"
My guess:
"Riley has played hard and has earned the start"
by stgeorgefan · 11/25/2012
stgeorgefan wrote:
For starting Riley Nelson vs the bowl team.... Lets see who gets it right
My guess:
"Riley has played hard and has earned the start"
Schmoe wrote:
Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
stgeorgefan wrote:Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Please re phrase "decent performance" Records were set.. i think "better than any other 1st time starter has ever done" would be suffice.
stgeorgefan wrote:Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Please re phrase "decent performance" Records were set.. i think "better than any other 1st time starter has ever done" would be suffice.
Schmoe wrote:
Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Schmoe wrote:Schmoe wrote:
Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Please re phrase "decent performance" Records were set.. i think "better than any other 1st time starter has ever done" would be suffice.
Yes, records for a QB's first start, that's quite the qualifier. I'm not saying that Lark didn't play a good game or that it's not awesome to see a QB who can throw down field, but the reactions by some fans make me laugh, as if we've had Peyton Manning sitting on the bench. You all watched this same Lark playing vs. Idaho and not looking so hot, or did you miss that game?
Cougs_Rule wrote:
And most likely better than a 65%, drugged up Riley.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">
Schmoe wrote:Schmoe wrote:
Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Please re phrase "decent performance" Records were set.. i think "better than any other 1st time starter has ever done" would be suffice.
Yes, records for a QB's first start, that's quite the qualifier. I'm not saying that Lark didn't play a good game or that it's not awesome to see a QB who can throw down field, but the reactions by some fans make me laugh, as if we've had Peyton Manning sitting on the bench. You all watched this same Lark playing vs. Idaho and not looking so hot, or did you miss that game?
mizzoucoug wrote:stgeorgefan wrote:Maybe he'll simply laugh and say "It was New Mexico State, stop wetting yourselves over a decent performance."
Please re phrase "decent performance" Records were set.. i think "better than any other 1st time starter has ever done" would be suffice.
Yes, records for a QB's first start, that's quite the qualifier. I'm not saying that Lark didn't play a good game or that it's not awesome to see a QB who can throw down field, but the reactions by some fans make me laugh, as if we've had Peyton Manning sitting on the bench. You all watched this same Lark playing vs. Idaho and not looking so hot, or did you miss that game?
I don't see much of this Peyton comparison actually. What we acknowledge, and so must you, is that Lark looks as though he can make all the throws and has the smarts to take care of the ball very efficiently. The outcry is due to the fact that Lark seems to be very capable as a QB for this offense and has been rotting on the bench during pivotal games this season when the starter has both sucked and been injured. Clear enough?