dmcougar wrote:
Unbelievable. You threw the knives at Heaps and all you have for Rley is excuses. You remind me of the media that press continuously protect and cover up and simultaneously handicap him as though he isn't capable of more.
Here is the most rediculous post of the day. I called for a look see at Lark - the guy everyone wants to see when Heaps was losing to a USU team that was not bowl eligible. Then I was happy to see Nelson the next season when Heaps was about to do it again. Heaps - the guy that promised a NC, was supposed to be a lock for the Heisman his junior year or sooner so he could go NFL a year early.
Nelson makes no such claims. Here is the difference - I set my expectations for Nelson realistically so I would not need to change them after losses to bad teams.
I do not need to make excuses for Nelson - I am just playing back the predictions I made when you were calling me the Riley Nelson apologist last summer.
I did not expect much from Heaps early in his career either. Right again.
Here is another difference - I never said I wished Heaps never came or did not deserve a schollie. I said he needed more experience and hated to see him transfer.
Here is another prediction - if he does not already, Jake will eventually realize that his transfer was a huge missed opportunity - borne of his on-going impatience. He would have had to endure a porous OL, but he would have had a defense that gave him chances to win on big stages and have the reins as a Senior in 2013 vs the most impressive BYU schedule ever. If ready he would have taken over in week 2 2nd half. If good enough, he would have never relinquished it.
You hate Nelson for some past reason before 2010 - you have admitted it - just not said what it was. Feel free to clarify that.
I do not and never have hated Jake Heaps.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">