The River of Denial

Why did it take 2 losses to realize the Oline had a problem? And to change things up? Didn't Weber blowing up our Oline teach anything?



Why did it take 2 losses for Bronco to accept that an injured Riley did NOT give us our best chance to win? And that even superman Roley had criptonite vulnerability? I would have even accepted one loss to teach Bronco that Riley could NOT go.



The changes and personell were available and accessible THE WHOLE TIME. Why did it take so long?



I'm in denial. But I dare say some of you are in more denial than I am.

I think you should give up your day job and become a headline writer

Because Bronco has ALWAYS given players and coaches enough rope with which to - proverbially speaking - hang themselves.



He gave the OL coach and players a chance to correct the struggles, before asking for changes to be made.

Hill was not ready then - especially for those opponents in those loud and crazy venues.



But then Hill got experience at BSU and Doman spent a full week prepping Hill and Hill only to start.



And then, we were playing a team that gave up 70 points to Nevada which also made this home game a good time to try out our 3rd choice at center and F Anar at OL and get them experienced.



That is why BUU should mix in more of these type of opponents early. Plus - we beat them and the fans get happier.



Before you ask why he went for two - reflect on two missed EPs and one ugly make last night at home, quiet, and no pressure.



The coaches have more information about player readiness than we have.



[ Post made via Mobile Device ] http://cougarcorner.com/images/mobile.png" alt="" loading="lazy" style="max-width:100%">