M
MarsAt least they aren't going to lose another BCS Bowl game this year. :P
The bad news is that Andre Ware was right.
by Mars · 11/11/2009
gmj81 wrote:
I truly believe that if Bradford hadn't gone down, OU would still have gone to a BCS bowl game this year. It certainly wouldn't have been the title game and they likely still would have lost to Texas but they probably wouldn't lost to any other teams but BYU and UT.
frdbtr wrote:
Don't all these guys have high school all american players as back ups? Why don't they just step right in and dominate. It seems to me that OK thought they were better then they really were and now have mailed in the season. What a disgrace to the fan support of that team.
Schmoe wrote:
You can put a positive spin on it by saying "look how close the games were, they even played Texas within a field goal!" But when you don't even score a touchdown against Nebraska, NEBRASKA? That pretty much says it all.
mormonrasta wrote:Don't all these guys have high school all american players as back ups? Why don't they just step right in and dominate. It seems to me that OK thought they were better then they really were and now have mailed in the season. What a disgrace to the fan support of that team.
Mailing it in?
Oklahoma is 9th in total defense and 7th in scoring defense. They have lost 4 games by a aggregate total of TWELVE POINTS!!!http://www.cfbstats.com/2009/leader/national/team/defense/split01/category09/sort01.html
To me, that's not a sign of mailing it in. That's a sign of Redshirt Freshman QB playing behind a patchwork OL throwing to woefully inexperienced receivers and TEs with a coaching staff that inexplicably doesn't have confidence in the running game.
Schmoe wrote:
When you don't even score a touchdown against Nebraska, NEBRASKA? That pretty much says it all.