C
Cougs_RuleSame format as ranking the 2011 schedule.
by Cougs_Rule · 7/5/2012
YNot wrote:
The 2012 schedule difficulty is similar to the 2010 schedule:
at Utah (2010) = at Utah (2012)
at FSU (2010) = at GA Tech (2012)
at TCU (2010) = at Notre Dame (2012)
Washington (2010) = Washington St. (2012)
Nevada (2010) = Oregon St. (2012)
at USU, SDSU, Wyoming, UNLV, at CSU, New Mexico (2010) similar to USU, Hawaii, at NMSU, at SJSU, Idaho, Weber St. (2012)
The differences: at Boise St. (2012) is more difficult than at Air Force (2010) and Weber State (2012) is likely less difficult than one of the above-mentioned MWC (2010) games.
Luckily, this year's BYU team should play better than their 2010 counterparts. 9-3 or even 10-2 is much more doable than the 6-6 record in 2010.
Cougarbib2 wrote:
I was right there with you until you just blew off the BSU difference,
Here is what is and is not important.
It does not matter whether one year had the #1 team in the country on the road and the other year had #10 on the road. You are almost certain to lose either way.
It does not matter if cupcake Weber State had more frosting than cupcake New Mexico. You are almost certain to win either way.
What does matter is how many opponents you play that will be expected to beat you and how many other games you play where you Re favored, but only slightly.
2012 has at least one more expected loss and at least as many close calls.