G
gmj81By using the Collie Matrix calculator and adding the best possible remaining win for each of the top 5 teams from week 10, the final BCS rankings would look something like this:
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. TCU
4. Cincy
5. Alabama
TCU basically has no chance at jumping Texas without a Longhorn loss and the winner of the SEC is virtually guaranteed a spot in the title game. But Cincy also likely won't jump TCU either. TCU's ranking gets boosted the highest with a win over the pukes and a BYU win over the pukes as well. If the pukes beat BYU, it's a couple ten thousandths less. Boise State likely won't be #6 but should definitely be in the top 8.
So the question becomes, if TCU completely dominates the rest of its schedule, and Texas doesn't, will the pollsters think high enough of TCU to boost them past the Horns, even if the Computers don't? Also, with two non-BCS teams in the top 8, can the BCS afford not to invite both TCU and Boise, even though they may not be as big of a draw as an OSU or USC considering they are already under fire for being monopolistic? I really don't see both getting into BCS bowls but I just wonder if they are worried about the evidence that would provide Congress when Boise is clearly by the BCS's very own ranking system one of the top 8 teams, yet can't even get one of the ten BCS big money game slots.
1. Florida
2. Texas
3. TCU
4. Cincy
5. Alabama
TCU basically has no chance at jumping Texas without a Longhorn loss and the winner of the SEC is virtually guaranteed a spot in the title game. But Cincy also likely won't jump TCU either. TCU's ranking gets boosted the highest with a win over the pukes and a BYU win over the pukes as well. If the pukes beat BYU, it's a couple ten thousandths less. Boise State likely won't be #6 but should definitely be in the top 8.
So the question becomes, if TCU completely dominates the rest of its schedule, and Texas doesn't, will the pollsters think high enough of TCU to boost them past the Horns, even if the Computers don't? Also, with two non-BCS teams in the top 8, can the BCS afford not to invite both TCU and Boise, even though they may not be as big of a draw as an OSU or USC considering they are already under fire for being monopolistic? I really don't see both getting into BCS bowls but I just wonder if they are worried about the evidence that would provide Congress when Boise is clearly by the BCS's very own ranking system one of the top 8 teams, yet can't even get one of the ten BCS big money game slots.

