superchargedcougar wrote:
One thing better about Nelson is that Tebow threw off his back foot a whole lot and still does in the NFL. He is definitely a better runner than Nelson though
Yeah, there are a number of mobile QBs that I'd compare Riley Nelson to before Tim Tebow.
I actually thought this thread was going to be about the similarities between the Riley Nelson controversy these last few weeks and the Tebow controversy that the Denver Broncos are facing. In both cases:
-you had an incumbent QB who by all metrics won the position prior to the season.
-the eventual starter not only struggled against the incumbent, but was in danger of falling to the 3rd spot on the depth chart.
-the incumbent QB had, for period, put up decent numbers as the starter.
-the pundits and talking heads that followed both teams repeatedly declared that the eventual starter was "incapable" at playing football at that level, i.e. NFL or D-1 football.
-Eventually, the play of the original starter fell to a level where you almost HAD to try the backup just to see if he could do anything better.
-Both earned the job based on 4th-quarter heroics.
Which is odd, because I've been a Riley fan all the way but thought all those Denver fans chanting "Te-bow!" were idiots.
I do think the two are similar to each other in the sense that they're both gamers. I don't think Tebow & Nelson do as well in practice because they seem to thrive on the moment. I hope Nelson keeps it up.