D
Dcr36The other day I was wondering: if our 2009 schedule was played with the same players on the offensive side of the ball, but with our current defense, how would the season have turned out?
I think you could make the case that we would have run the table. At least go 11-1. We have a weak secondary this year, but of our 2009 opponents, only Bradford had the chops to really exploit that, and our front seven would have chewed through OU's weak O-line every down. UCF showed that this defense can do a better job of containing mobile QBs, so I think we could have slowed down FSU, and it's not like we struggled to put points against them.
That only leaves TCU, who really seemed to have our number. I always felt like TCU got into Max's head more than any other opponent. Still, if he had more chances to put together drives, and if the defense could keep it close going into the second half, I think Max's confidence would've improved dramatically.
Any thoughts?
I think you could make the case that we would have run the table. At least go 11-1. We have a weak secondary this year, but of our 2009 opponents, only Bradford had the chops to really exploit that, and our front seven would have chewed through OU's weak O-line every down. UCF showed that this defense can do a better job of containing mobile QBs, so I think we could have slowed down FSU, and it's not like we struggled to put points against them.
That only leaves TCU, who really seemed to have our number. I always felt like TCU got into Max's head more than any other opponent. Still, if he had more chances to put together drives, and if the defense could keep it close going into the second half, I think Max's confidence would've improved dramatically.
Any thoughts?

