Good replacement for Omer?

BYU Cougars Football. Still Open, now Independent.
taekwondave
Sophomore
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:16 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by taekwondave »

Now, there you go. Show me some more pictures of the Lakers if you like.

However, SPEAKING of the Lakers, I happen to know that Phil Jackson is a big yoga guy. Had the Chicago Bulls doing yoga every one of their championship years. I am sure the Lakers follow a very similar regimen. For those who have done yoga though, it's really nothing like "stretching". It's a strange art. Most of the "stretches" that are done in yoga (and I STILL wouldn't recommend even yoga for a pre-game warmup aside from possibly some sun salutations to get your blood flowing. But a light jog will accomplish that just fine.) aren't really stretches at all but isometric holds. It's incredible the flexibility you gain through yoga but you would never even know you were "stretching". The concept in yoga is that of building heat in a muscle so that it will flex, stretch and bend. The first axiom in yoga is "even iron will bend if you heat it up enough". The very thought of stretching a cold muscle makes reason stare. I can't blame the studies on stretching that have found very little benefit to it as I think most stretching regimens never utilize heat the way they should to really stretch the muscles like they have the ability to do.

The majority of studies I have found have shown not only pregame stretching to be useless but it can actually harm your athletic performance that follows it.


taekwondave
Sophomore
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:16 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by taekwondave »

craigoscarson wrote:
taekwondave wrote:"According to an stone et al in his article which reviewed researches on stretching (December 206, Strength and Conditioning Journal, vol 28, No 6, p66-74)), stretching may not be as wonderful as we were made to believe.
Stretching during pre-game warm up has not been shown to enhance performance. In fact, the reverse was observed to occur. Pre-game stretching has been shown to diminish maximum strength and explosive strength, resulting in decreased performance in sports such as sprinting, static jumps, gymnastics.
What about doing stretches after a game? Does it help? Is it useful at all? A review of the studies done by the author showed that post game stretching can bring about some benefits such as increased muscle force production which translates into faster running speed, improved vertical jumps. However the underlying mechanism remains unclear to the authors.
What about the claim that stretching can reduce the risk of suffering from injuries? Studies have shown that pre-game stretching has little or no effect at all on the rate of injury except in sports which require a greater ROM (range of motion) such as gymnastics (doing splits, handstands), golf (trunk rotation).
So to stretch or not to stretch? In summary, the authors do not encourage stretching pre-game unless you need to achieve a certain ROM for the sports to perform effectively without injury. However as stated before, it is important to remember that pre-game stretching can reduce maximum and explosive muscle force production. As such pre-game stretching should be kept as short as possible to minimise the detrimental effects. Emphasis on maintaining ROM of each sports can be done by doing stretches after game or training and on off days. Post game stretches are also encouraged for their benefical effects of increased muscle force production."

http://myfitnessfanatics.com/?p=10

"Overwhelming research concludes that pre-exercise stretching, especially for those who do not use short bursts of muscular activity, may result in a reduction in performance of up to five percent. At best, literature shows that weeks of regular stretching exercises, in conjunction with warm ups, may help athletes reduce injury by up to five percent. This small percentage may help athletes who use short bursts of energy such as sprinters improve their fifty-yard running speed by fractions of a second. Other sports that use continuous movements, such as cycling, should not expect the same benefits. Regardless of research, athletes, especially runners, continue to stretch, attempting to reduce injuries and increase their performance. More detailed studies and research are needed to find all possible neurological effects of stretching." Shrier, Ian. "When and Whom to Stretch?." Physician & Sportsmedicine 33.3(2005): 22-26.
Overwhelming research concludes that pre-exercise stretching, especially for those who do not use short bursts of muscular activity may result in a reduction in performance of up to five percent
.... you mean like football?

try again, these articles do not suggest what you're suggesting... and the 1st article is not in a scientfic journal nor does it cite verifed scientific study; however it does state that stretching is beneficial in sports that require high degree ROM and short bursts of muscular activity........... like football.

The 2nd article backs up what we're saying...
weeks of regular stretching exercises, in conjunction with warm ups, may help athletes reduce injury by up to five percent. This small percentage may help athletes who use short bursts of energy such as sprinters improve their fifty-yard running speed by fractions of a second
these articles certainly do not address your assertion that pregame stretching increases injury and should not be done...
These articles do not suggest what I'm suggesting? Did you READ them? The first article is not a scientific journal. Woops. But you're still pulling from it to make your point, despite the fact that you're twisting it's words. Read what it says. Just because it says that it ESPECIALLY harms those that don't play sports that require short bursts of energy does not infer that is BENEFICIAL to those that DO.

As for the 2nd article, it does NOT back up what you're saying, unless you're saying what I'm saying and you're disagreeing with me for no reason. Can you seriously be twisting an article that much? It clearly says that WEEKS OF REGULAR STRETCHING EXERCISES can help athletes reduce injury. I OBVIOUSLY believe in STRETCHING (remember, I'm the big yoga enthusiast?). There is a clear difference that it is making between a regular stretching regimen that is coupled with warming up and a pregame stretch. This does NOT say that pregame stretching has any benefits. Read the whole article. You're acting like an anti mormon that takes a statement of an authority out of context and insists that's what they meant. The article is obvious as to what point it's making.

As for your last point about these articles not addressing my assertion that pregame stretching increases injury and should not be done... That's twisting my words a bit. Increases...WHAT injury? The assertion I made was that stretching a COLD muscle will TEAR it. Why do you think they said, "In conjunction with warm-ups"? Only an IDIOT would stretch a cold muscle.


taekwondave
Sophomore
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:16 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by taekwondave »

I think the problem here is you're seeing what you want to see. You're confusing the concept of warming up your muscles in order to stretch effectively (you don't stretch cold muscles, you only tear them) and using stretching in your pre-game warm-ups. There is no evidence that stretching during pre-game warmups prevents injury or improves performance but there IS evidence that warming up improves stretching. That's what you've clearly confused in that article.

However I'm sure we don't disagree that stretching a cold muscle is hazardous to the muscle, do we?
Last edited by taekwondave on Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
CougarClaw
Pro
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:37 am
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by CougarClaw »

snoscythe wrote:If stretching is so bad, why do all professional athletes in all sports insist on stretching before practices/competition? Seems like the people with millions of dollars at stake would be changing things up if there was any merit to this.

And why is Harvey shaving time off his 40? For the same reason EVERY athlete shaves time off of their 40 leading up to the combine.

Image
really good points but um...what's with the helicopters?

Just an FYI, US army stretches its soldiers before all workouts too. Just sayin.


taekwondave
Sophomore
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:16 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by taekwondave »

haha, those helicopters are sweet. Thanks.

As for the U.S. Army stretching people....what is your point?


taekwondave
Sophomore
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 4:16 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by taekwondave »

ANYWAYS, the whole POINT of this article is not even ABOUT stretching. It's about the overall program of Coach Omer as I see it. I think it has proven to be (and many other BYU trainers feel the same way) detrimental to our athletes. I think we'd have fewer injuries because we'd be less susceptible to injury if we used a different program. The slew of knee, groin, and hammy injuries on our team the last few years lends credit to that assumption. Now, PERHAPS we don't have any more injuries than the average program, but who wants to be average? And as far as speed goes, someone made an argument earlier that the speed problem would take care of itself with better recruiting. That's a big assumption. On my team we were all worse off than we had been before we worked with him for a year. After we left him our vertical jumps quickly increased, our shoulder injuries ceased, and our sprinting times improved. Some of my team members had stopped coming to workouts I THOUGHT for school reasons but as it turned out they had noticed their performance had declined significantly after we began our training with him and made up excuses not to come to workouts. You can take a finely tuned athlete in high school and put him into a crap program and watch all that speed you recruited disappear pretty quickly.

As for the NFL players that lend him credit, I have no rebuttal. They think he helped them they think he helped them. I can't argue with that. But I CAN argue with the fact that when BYU has been beat the last few years, I'm not even close to the only one who is saying, "Man, why are they so much FASTER than us?" And the video I posted was to show that contrary to what everyone here seems to believe, speed most certainly CAN be taught. If you're not fast you CAN be fast. If you can't jump high right now, with the right training you will jump high later. In this video he takes a guy from Weber and takes him from a 4.65 forty to a 4.43 or something like that. Why wasn't he running a 4.43 when he was PLAYING in college???? If he's capable of running that fast why WASN'T he running that fast? Training. I say we get a new trainer, unless our old dog Omer learns some new tricks and proves me wrong.


User avatar
Mars
Retired
Posts: 9666
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by Mars »

taekwondave wrote: It's about the overall program of Coach Omer as I see it. I think it has proven to be (and many other BYU trainers feel the same way) detrimental to our athletes.
Wait a second...

If you don't like Coach Omer, and have a personal beef against him where you blame him for one of your past injuries, how come you never said anything about it before now? Why keep quiet about this for so long, instead of voicing your opinion earlier??



;)


Mars Cauthon, Prince of the Cougars!
Resident board douchebag.
https://twitter.com/#!/eldermars
Y12
Senior
Posts: 869
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:02 am
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by Y12 »

It seems like the strength and conditioning coach is a guy you want to change every several years. Before Omer was Chuck Stiggins. He was very well respected professionally and had a "cutting edge" strength program. However, when Crowton replaced him, Omer was being praised for helping players increase their bench, squat, and overcoming plateauing.

I think the real issue is to change the training regime. The human body gets used to routines and needs a change to stimulate improvement. Omer needs to find a new way to do things or else BYU should find someone new who will do things differently.


User avatar
hawkwing
TV Analyst
Posts: 13475
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:35 am
Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Location: Eagle Mountain, UT
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 38 times
Contact:

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by hawkwing »

taekwondave wrote: It's about the overall program of Coach Omer as I see it. I think it has proven to be (and many other BYU trainers feel the same way) detrimental to our athletes.
I really disagree with this idea that most trainers at BYU feel Coach Omer's program is detrimental to the athletes. Unless you can back this up with anything more than your one anecdotal experience. Because I have just as much anecdotal evidence that says trainers and players are pleased with what he's doing.

The facts as I see it are these:

1. Before Omer was brought in, the players were getting soft.
2. After Omer came in, the players reached higher levels of ferocity and toughness that we hadn't seen in years, if ever.
3. Opposing teams often talk about the Cougars physicality and toughness after playing us.
4. Our fast guys have been fast, and speed wasn't that great on the team until recent recruiting classes.


User avatar
snoscythe
Retired
Posts: 8811
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:52 am
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Good replacement for Omer?

Post by snoscythe »

Y12 wrote:It seems like the strength and conditioning coach is a guy you want to change every several years. Before Omer was Chuck Stiggins. He was very well respected professionally and had a "cutting edge" strength program. However, when Crowton replaced him, Omer was being praised for helping players increase their bench, squat, and overcoming plateauing.

I think the real issue is to change the training regime. The human body gets used to routines and needs a change to stimulate improvement. Omer needs to find a new way to do things or else BYU should find someone new who will do things differently.
Stiggins getting replaced had nothing to do with his conditioning....it had to do with his attitude towards athletes of the fairer sex.


Post Reply