Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Feel free to discuss appropriate non-BYU/Sports related topics here. We ask you to respect other users, the Church, avoid soapbox postings, and keep it clean.
Post Reply
StatsCougar
BLUEshirt
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:55 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fan
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Post by StatsCougar »

In the space of a week, Donald Trump as gone from no chance of winning to little chance of winning. The results of this week's simulations has Mr. Trump winning 4.5% of the time, with .5% chance of a tie. (Still no states won by Gary Johnson.)

This shift puts HRC average electoral college count to 301, a drop of 34 votes. The shift happens as Texas moved more into the firm red category (40% to 35%) and several other states moving to be more neutral (Ohio [42% vs 40%] and Florida [42% vs 42.1%]). Even with these shifts, the polls are not strong enough to overcome the built in advantage that the Democrats have with the coastal states.

The question can be asked whether HRC health is part of the shift in the polls. (I have read results that say no, but it could be sub-conscious part of how voters think.) The recent events on American soil should also shake up the polls, likely against HRC.

With the first Presidential debate a week a way, polls will hit hard to look at a before and after picture of voters views. For Trump to tighten up this contest, he will need to sway voter in the battleground and light blue states to abandon HRC (whether to vote from him or vote third party.)

Notes: Graphics will follow, once the issue with uploading pictures has been resolved. There was a small change in the methodology as well, in that polls that look at registered voters instead of likely voters are now weighed less heavily.
Attachments
Sept_19_Poll.png
Last edited by StatsCougar on Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:50 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
scott715
TV Analyst
Posts: 12372
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:56 am
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Location: Pendleton, OR
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Post by scott715 »

Things are starting to get interesting.


User avatar
SpiffCoug
TV Analyst
Posts: 13335
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:11 am
Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Post by SpiffCoug »

In your methodology, how many polls still have pre-9/11 & the HRC physical collapse data. It seems like that even has really changed things.


BYU PER W/L Since 1972: 432-76 (.850)
(8.4x
YDS)+(330xTD)+(100xCOM)-(200xINT)
..................ATT
SpiffCoug's posts are BB-8 approved!
Image
User avatar
hawkwing
TV Analyst
Posts: 13475
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:35 am
Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Location: Eagle Mountain, UT
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 38 times
Contact:

Re: Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Post by hawkwing »

Attachments should be working now. If my work around is working consistently.


StatsCougar
BLUEshirt
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:55 pm
Fan Level: BYU Fan
Prediction Group: CougarCorner

Re: Political Polling Sept 19, 2016

Post by StatsCougar »

SpiffCoug wrote:In your methodology, how many polls still have pre-9/11 & the HRC physical collapse data. It seems like that even has really changed things.
Most of the polls are pre-collapse, as I'm trying to keep a month's worth of polling. Part of the reason for this is some states aren't polled all that often (Alaska for example), so . But to help compensate for that, I am using a weighting scheme. The older a poll is, the less weight it will carry.


Post Reply