On Your Honor
- ABYUFAN
- Pro
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:59 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Mars
- Retired
- Posts: 9666
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: On Your Honor
I like the honor code, in general. But then you have cases like the girl who was kicked out of BYU for being raped. Human justice always cuts both ways, but it's still better than anarchy.
- CrimsonCoug
- Senior
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:50 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: On Your Honor
My SIL was hired by SVU to, among other things, help them think through the enforcement of their honor code. Her view and recommendation was that if a student signed a code of conduct and later violated that code, there should be consequences to that.
Her recommendation was rejected and the school now has a system more similar to ND--an honor code exists as a set of encouraged ideals and guideline, but there are no real consequences to flouting it. We live in the DC area and have SVU students come through our home from time to time. Those who are there, particularly the girls, tell us that there has been a spike in behaviors that make the young men undesirable as spouses: bad language, more drinking, permissive attitudes towards pornography, and having their dorms and living areas compromised by a roommate bringing home her boyfriend. They feel the moral quality of the student body has deteriorated, and they don't like it.
For all its warts, the BYU HC does serve a useful purpose. I'm in favor of trying new tweaks to mitigate the negatives from it, but there will always be tradeoffs with it, and despite those, the HC is still very much a net positive.
Her recommendation was rejected and the school now has a system more similar to ND--an honor code exists as a set of encouraged ideals and guideline, but there are no real consequences to flouting it. We live in the DC area and have SVU students come through our home from time to time. Those who are there, particularly the girls, tell us that there has been a spike in behaviors that make the young men undesirable as spouses: bad language, more drinking, permissive attitudes towards pornography, and having their dorms and living areas compromised by a roommate bringing home her boyfriend. They feel the moral quality of the student body has deteriorated, and they don't like it.
For all its warts, the BYU HC does serve a useful purpose. I'm in favor of trying new tweaks to mitigate the negatives from it, but there will always be tradeoffs with it, and despite those, the HC is still very much a net positive.
The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited to the obvious realities. We need men who can dream of things that never were and ask, "Why Not?" -JFK & SWK
- CrimsonCoug
- Senior
- Posts: 888
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:50 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: On Your Honor
I suppose it depends on your epistemology, or how you know what you know. From the point of view of empiricism, I agree that you'd be hard pressed to collect unbiased, representative data about this one way or the other. But from the epistemology of rationalism, it stands to reason that creating additional consequences for admitting to bad behavior would be expected to result in fewer people admitting bad behavior (as well as less bad behavior in general--see my SVU post above).
The problems of the world cannot possibly be solved by skeptics or cynics whose horizons are limited to the obvious realities. We need men who can dream of things that never were and ask, "Why Not?" -JFK & SWK
- Gunk
- Over-Achiever
- Posts: 6508
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:23 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: On Your Honor
I'm not entirely against the HC and it's enforcement. I do think it is long overdue for an update. Students came up with it in the 70s, nearly 40 years ago.
Personally, I think the moral aspects of the HC should be no different than what's in the temple recommend questions. If you are worthy to attend the temple, the most sacred place on earth, you should be worthy to attend BYU.
Things like hair length, hair style, sleeve lengths, shorts length, tattoos, piercings, etc. are dumb and have no baring on a person's morality or righteousness.
Personally, I think the moral aspects of the HC should be no different than what's in the temple recommend questions. If you are worthy to attend the temple, the most sacred place on earth, you should be worthy to attend BYU.
Things like hair length, hair style, sleeve lengths, shorts length, tattoos, piercings, etc. are dumb and have no baring on a person's morality or righteousness.
Follow me to nowhere twitter.com/gakunkel
- BroncoBot
- Retired
- Posts: 9860
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:30 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 68 times
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: On Your Honor
HA HA> Not exactly how that went down Mars. If I knowingly took hallucinogenic drugs while at BYU, I'd have expected to be kicked out, no matter what happened afterwards. It was definitely a terrible incident.
- Mars
- Retired
- Posts: 9666
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:13 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
Re: On Your Honor
You seem to be referring to a different incident than I am. My example didn't make the news, luckily for BYU.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:41 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: On Your Honor
The counterpoint goes - BYU students should be more like LDS missionaries, where grooming and dress are relevant and very much enforced. BYU students should be held to a higher standard because they are the outward representation of what BYU stands for.Gunk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 24, 2017 9:43 pm I'm not entirely against the HC and it's enforcement. I do think it is long overdue for an update. Students came up with it in the 70s, nearly 40 years ago.
Personally, I think the moral aspects of the HC should be no different than what's in the temple recommend questions. If you are worthy to attend the temple, the most sacred place on earth, you should be worthy to attend BYU.
Things like hair length, hair style, sleeve lengths, shorts length, tattoos, piercings, etc. are dumb and have no baring on a person's morality or righteousness.
I still can't believe that shorts aren't allowed at BYU-Idaho....
-
- All-American
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:41 am
- Fan Level: BYU Fanatic
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Been thanked: 4 times
- ABYUFAN
- Pro
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 5:59 pm
- Fan Level: BYU Blue Goggled Homer
- Prediction Group: CougarCorner
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: On Your Honor
If by "suppresses the repentance process" you mean that it is a tool to keep people from needing to engage in the repentance process in the first place - i.e. the wall at the top of the cliff rather than the ambulance at the bottom, I guess I could - in theory - agree with that, but I doubt that's what you mean.