CougarCorner

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T14:42:07-06:00

Taysom turnovers, against SUU: 2.
Tanner turnovers: 0.
Which is reflected in the QBR....
Fumbles are?

Yes.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/6833 ... ack-rating

Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:42 pm

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T14:26:45-06:00

Taysom turnovers, against SUU: 2.
Tanner turnovers: 0.
Which is reflected in the QBR....

Fumbles are?

Statistics: Posted by Mars — Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:26 pm

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T13:18:24-06:00

Taysom turnovers, against SUU: 2.
Tanner turnovers: 0.

Which is reflected in the QBR....

Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:18 pm

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T12:57:20-06:00

Taysom turnovers, against SUU: 2.
Tanner turnovers: 0.

Statistics: Posted by Mars — Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:57 pm

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T11:44:49-06:00

Taysom's stat line:
22/29, 320 yds, 2 TD, 1 INT, 7 rushes for 39 yds and 1 TD. PER 184.4, QBR 95.5(raw)/87(adj)
Taysom had 9 drives that resulted in 31 points. (4 TD, 1 FG, one missed FG).

Tanner's stat line:
11/13, 121 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT, 4 rushes for 42 yds and 0 TD, PER 162.8, QBR 71.4(raw)/44.2(adj)
Tanner had 3 drives that resulted in 6 points (2 FG, one missed FG).

Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:44 am

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T11:39:01-06:00

I think it was pretty clear that the coaches were correct in their assessment that Taysom Hill gave the Cougars the best chance to win the games early in the schedule. Now of course it doesn't matter as even Detmer should be able to beat the teams remaining on the schedule.
Not sure I agree. But it doesn't matter at this point. I think it was also clear that the rumors that Tanner is just lost in the offense and doesn't know what to do, were just false. You don't go 11-13 against any opponent if you have no idea where the ball is supposed to go or what the plays are.

But I also didn't see anything that made me think it was the WRONG call to name Taysom the starter. I just don't think there was a wrong decision to be made.

I hadn't heard, or if I had given any serious consideration to the idea that Tanner was lost in this offense. Though he looked a few steps behind where Taysom was at the start of the year, he still did impress with his later passing and scrambles once he settled in. He'll be pretty good next year, if the offensive line improves.

Statistics: Posted by hawkwing — Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:39 am

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T11:33:56-06:00

I think it was pretty clear that the coaches were correct in their assessment that Taysom Hill gave the Cougars the best chance to win the games early in the schedule. Now of course it doesn't matter as even Detmer should be able to beat the teams remaining on the schedule.

Not sure I agree. But it doesn't matter at this point. I think it was also clear that the rumors that Tanner is just lost in the offense and doesn't know what to do, were just false. You don't go 11-13 against any opponent if you have no idea where the ball is supposed to go or what the plays are.

But I also didn't see anything that made me think it was the WRONG call to name Taysom the starter. I just don't think there was a wrong decision to be made.

Statistics: Posted by SpiffCoug — Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:33 am

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T10:30:44-06:00

KJ Hall has a really bright future at BYU. I am excited for him.

Statistics: Posted by frdbtr — Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:30 am

Re: SUU game

2016-11-14T10:06:17-06:00

I think it was pretty clear that the coaches were correct in their assessment that Taysom Hill gave the Cougars the best chance to win the games early in the schedule. Now of course it doesn't matter as even Detmer should be able to beat the teams remaining on the schedule.

Statistics: Posted by hawkwing — Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:06 am

Re: SUU game

2016-11-13T19:44:30-06:00

I was glad to see Detmer actually let Mangum run the offense. I also like how he brought Mangum in early. In the post game Sitake said he brought him before "the plan" called for it because Detmer wanted to see how Mangum would react to be thrown into the game.

Mangum was probably thinking he'd play the 2nd half, I like how he performed. I the coaches finding ways to test him even in a game that was never in doubt.

Statistics: Posted by SpiffCoug — Sun Nov 13, 2016 7:44 pm