Statistics: Posted by hawkwing — Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:17 pm
Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Fri Jun 13, 2014 12:42 pm
It was my thought that the NBA could do basically whatever they wanted for whatever reason they wanted. Like how Boy Scouts don't HAVE to include gay scout leaders. There seems to be little legislation when it comes to interfering with private business decisions. They could have kicked him out based on his favorite color for all I know (and yes, I may be very wrong about that premise).The final ruling on the legality of the NBA's actions will be settled in a court of law - where I believe Donald Sterling has a good case. The NBA had a knee jerk reaction to an illegally obtained recording that they made a Draconian decision on... What ever happened to gathering all the facts surrounding a case in a fair and impartial manner?
Statistics: Posted by Ddawg — Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:41 pm
Statistics: Posted by Mars — Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:31 pm
Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Sun Jun 01, 2014 5:28 pm
In a court of law perhaps. Probably much less so in the boardroom of a private corporation.The recording made of Donald Sterling was recorded without his knowledge or consent. That is illegal in California... The fruits of an illegal act are not admissible.
Statistics: Posted by Ddawg — Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:29 am
Statistics: Posted by snoscythe — Sun Jun 01, 2014 9:33 am
Statistics: Posted by Mars — Sun Jun 01, 2014 2:13 am